Monthly Archives: January 2006

Los Angeles, I’m Yours

How great is that Tad Friend piece (not online—buy it) on high- and pretty-low-speed police chases in L.A.? Best thing in the issue, and last week’s was a very good issue. Tad Friend also talked to Ben Greenman for the website. More of my issue highlights to come. I might do this every week, on Sundays. Or on other days, or every other week. Meanwhile, I have the new Ricky Gervais podcast to listen to. Here’s an excerpt from an interview Gervais did with DVD Times about his standup-comedy release Politics.

[MD] Did you put the interview with him on the DVD [of Politics] just to prove [Karl Pilkington] was a real guy?

[RG] Absolutely. Absolutely. Because I think people just won’t believe anyone thinks like that, and you can see that I just can’t believe what he’s saying and he surprises me constantly, every time I speak to him there’s something funny. Like, I saw Finding Nemo the other week, and I was on the phone to him and I said I’d just watched it and said “Brilliant innit” and it’s always good when you genuinely, without irony, see eye to eye with Karl it’s like a connection, like your child hasn’t spoken until now, you just want to nurture it. So I said it was great it was such a great story as well, and it’s beautiful how far animation has come, but it’s amazing how much it cost. And he said “Whatcha mean?” so I told him animation costs more than real films. “Rubbish. What’s the point of computers if it takes longer?” Well no Karl, it takes each animator one week to put 2 seconds on screen. And after raving about the film he said “fuck it, it’s not worth it, just a get a real fish and poke it with a stick.” [amazed] Just get a real fish and poke it with a stick?! It’s just incredible. The way he lives inside his head, it’s just a joy, so yeah I did put it on to let people know that I know the closest living thing to Homer Simpson.

Tootsie Pops

What a tasteless headline! I considered worse. For those without Atlantic subscriptions, Caitlin Flanagan’s review of Paul Ruditis’ book Rainbow Party (about, as Flanagan puts it, “the teenage oral-sex craze”) is also on the Powell’s Books website. The piece fascinated and irritated me. I’ll write more about that if I get a chance.

Since I last wrote about The Atlantic, by the way, my subscription kicked in, and I’m enjoying it tremendously. I’d let a few years lapse since I last read it regularly, and it strikes me now as essential, a slightly uneven but adventurous and vital roundup of new and serious thought. Overall, a harmonious complement to the NYer (yes, I know there are other magazines; I’m talking about these two specifically). I like the sidebars, for instance. What are people reading in other parts of the world? They tell you. That’s news I want, and here it is in a colorful graphic; that part of the magazine is like USA Today for the philosophically bookish.

Meanwhile, even this emphatic fan of Caitlin Flanagan isn’t so sure about her New Yorker essays.

The bridge, Didion, and Fayard Nicholas

The New Yorker‘s Alec Wilkinson was on WNYC’s Leonard Lopate Show today talking about his February 15, 1999, piece on suicide notes, along with Thomas Joiner, the author of a new book called Why People Die By Suicide. While Joiner was researching the book, his father killed himself. [See comments for more detail on this point.] The show (now downloadable) was strange and grim. Excerpts from the NYer archive summary of Wilkinson’s piece:

“The writer describes how twenty years ago, while he was a policeman in Wellfleet, Massachusetts, on Cape Cod, he imagined what it would be like to kill himself. He was twenty-three at the time…. The writer became interested in suicide notes because he thought they might contain revelations about the end of life that couldn’t be found anywhere else…. Only 1 out of 5 suicides is likely to leave a note…. The writer describes the oldest suicide note–a letter written on papyrus by an Egyptian man in 2000 B.C. The letter is titled “The Dispute with His Soul of One Who Is Tired of Life.”… [T]here are 5 kinds of suicide notes: notes that blame someone, notes that deny an obvious reason is the cause, notes that blame & deny, notes that contain an insight, and notes that contain no explanation at all…. The writer excerpts 10 notes in the article. Some of the notes discuss how life is no longer worth living, some blame others for their death, some give instructions for the dispersal of their property, some claim to be possessed by demons, etc.”

I happen to have that Egyptian poem (maybe I copied it from the issue at the time?). Spacing is off but it’s late, so I’ll fix later.

To whom can I speak today?
One’s fellows are evil;
The friends of today do not love.
To whom can I speak today?
Faces have disappeared:
Every man has a downcast face toward his fellow.
To whom can I speak today?
A man should arouse wrath by his evil character,
But he stirs everyone to laughter, in spite of
the wickedness of his sin.
To whom can I speak today?
There is no righteous;
The land is left to those who do wrong.
To whom can I speak today?
The sin that afflicts the land,
It has no end.

All day this has woven into what I’ve been reading. I used to say that the saddest double feature in the world would be Breaking the Waves and The Sweet Hereafter. But if you survived the cruel screening and were still unsure whether life was all about suffering, reading Joan Didion’s The Year of Magical Thinking would finish you off. I stopped reading it in public—I can’t not cry, I can’t not move to the next chapter. It’s brutal. Knowing how many thousands of times more brutal it was and is for Didion herself is not comforting.

While we’re on this sunny subject, here’s that Tad Friend piece on the “fatal grandeur” of Golden Gate Bridge, which people still talk about often (and plagiarize—apologies to the tipster at the time whose email I didn’t follow up on). Did Lopate perhaps originally intend to book Friend rather than Wilkinson? That would seem to make more sense, since Friend’s piece came out more recently and Wilkinson was understandably reticent on the subject. The compelling oft-repeated and occasionally filched passage:

Survivors often regret their decision in midair, if not before. Ken Baldwin and Kevin Hines both say they hurdled over the railing, afraid that if they stood on the chord they might lose their courage. Baldwin was twenty-eight and severely depressed on the August day in 1985 when he told his wife not to expect him home till late. “I wanted to disappear,” he said. “So the Golden Gate was the spot. I’d heard that the water just sweeps you under.” On the bridge, Baldwin counted to ten and stayed frozen. He counted to ten again, then vaulted over. “I still see my hands coming off the railing,” he said. As he crossed the chord in flight, Baldwin recalls, “I instantly realized that everything in my life that I’d thought was unfixable was totally fixable—except for having just jumped.”

Later in Friend’s piece, there’s an interesting coincidence of phrase with Didion’s title:

Jumpers tend to idealize what will happen after the step off the bridge. “Suicidal people have transformation fantasies and are prone to magical thinking, like children and psychotics,” Dr. Lanny Berman, the executive director of the American Association of Suicidology says. “Jumpers are drawn to the Golden Gate because they believe it’s a gateway to another place. They think that life will slow down in those final seconds, and then they’ll hit the water cleanly, like a high diver.”

That is not the case.

Fayard Nicholas R.I.P.

In other very sad news, the unmatched tap dancer Fayard Nicholas died this week. If the history of race in America and, as a result, Hollywood had been different, you’d already know this, and television would devote a week or a month to showing his leading-man movies. Do a little soft-shoe in private for him, or if you’re brave, go to a tap jam; discover you can swing. It’s easy. True, doing what Nicholas and his brother, Harold, did is probably impossible, but you can still do something joyful for yourself that’ll also carry forward a meaningful piece of what he loved and perfected.

Early Fayard Nicholas work

One longs for a camera phone


At the Lorimer L stop, in the white space above Eric Bana’s head in the Munich poster, a hand-drawn thought bubble containing these words in elegant script:

“Jeeze, I can’t even ball my wife anymore without thinking about how violence begets violence…what a moral.”

Lower down, Partnership for a Drug-Free America-style: “DON’T LET VENGEANCE RUIN YOUR SEX LIFE.”

Plagiarizing? At least know the literature

As always, Scott McLemee, a.k.a. The Bravery, stylishly whips centuries of thought into a graceful meringue in his essay about, among other things, confronting a “light-fingered academic” with the evidence of his crime:

I would give him a chance to explain himself, of course. But really there was not much he could say. Plagiarism is one offense where simply presenting the evidence often amounts to conviction.

To be honest, researching the story had involved a certain amount of aggressive glee on my part. There is a special pleasure that comes from establishing an airtight case. (Besides, the superego is a bit of a sadist.) But now, with the prospect of actually talking to the guy looming, it was surprising to feel contempt give way to pity. His luck had run out. In a couple of days, he would be notorious. It felt as if I were serving as his judge, jury, and executioner—not to mention the court stenographer. Oddly enough, I felt guilty.

Besides, the psychology of the serial plagiarist is so puzzling as to be a fairly absorbing mystery…. Continued.

He also reviews the new journal Plagiary: Cross-Disciplinary Studies in Plagiarism, Fabrication, and Falsification (which, says its editor, may even be “willing to consider articles from plagiarists”). Scott writes: “[T]he topic of plagiarism itself keeps returning. One professor after another gets caught in the act. The journalists and popular writers are just as prolific with other people’s words. And as for the topic of student plagiarism, forget it—who has time to keep up?” He goes on to consider the tricky distinction between “allusion” and “theft,” as well as the revealing roots of the word “plagiarism” itself.

I’ve long been happy that plagiarist.com is a poetry-resource site, and a pretty good one. I like to think of students happening on it by accident in a caffeine fog and smiling for a second as they realize the little joke that’s been played on them. And then they read some poems and…but let’s not get out of hand.

And for all your New Yorker needs, here’s that Malcolm Gladwell piece about plagiarim that everyone liked so much. Except I didn’t, really, because although it’s a fun story, Gladwell falls into his tendency to set up straw people and subtly polarize his subjects—nice, flower-bringing playwright; modern, laid-back journalist; literal, stingy psychiatrist—and that makes it all seem a bit unfair.

I like the typeface on the Plagiary website; is that New Century Schoolbook? It reminds me of a type I used to like to write in. Maybe when I was turning down my overwhelmed roommate’s offer of $100 to write her First-Year Seminar paper, then realizing how many hot bagels and scallion pancakes that would’ve bought. J., where are you now? You were so smart, and so stressed. I hope you’re calmer now.

Once again, Barnard pities Columbia

Lethem and Homes at Columbia 2/28

Nevertheless, it’s bound to be a scintillating evening, and really, how much better-looking a literary event are you going to find? Here are the details:

February 28, 7 p.m.:

DEBORAH TREISMAN with JONATHAN LETHEM and A.M. HOMES

The New Yorker fiction contributors Jonathan Lethem (Motherless Brooklyn) and A. M. Homes (Music for Torching) read from their work and talk with The New Yorker‘s fiction editor, Deborah Treisman.

On January 24, the tickets will become available to the public at the box office and by phone, 212-854-7799 (Monday-Friday 12-6 p.m.). 2 tickets per reservation. Columbia University’s Miller Theatre, Broadway at 116th St. Directions.

From the proofreader-seeking Columbia Arts Initiative blog.

Once upon a pair of wheels

Via Moldawer, a great blog by a woman cabbie, New York Hack. She posts some beautiful photos of sights seen en route, and her records of spirited conversations will remind you relationships between cabbies and passengers need not be either silent or contentious. For instance:

On a related note, I once drove a woman home who told me she had married her cab driver. He picked her up and they made a connection. Numbers were exchanged, dates went on, and eventually a marriage was had. At the time of our conversation, they had been married for nine years.

Actually, I can’t remember the last time a cab driver and I had anything but a good conversation. It’s like “bad service” in restaurants—funny how people who begin the interaction in a friendly way so rarely experience it. Every cab driver I ask tells me that the rude people and awful tippers are mainly the rich. Sad. Also, I’m sure you’re too intelligent to repeat this ignorant cliché, but for emdashes’ non-New York readers, New York cabbies are far from bad drivers, and their English is pretty damn fluent. (Maybe you just can’t decipher accents?) My aunt, who in the ’70s supported her acting career by driving a cab in New York, agrees. She thinks there were more female cabbies then, too. I wonder why that is?

My friend Liza Featherstone helped edit a book by Biju Mathew called Taxi!: Cabs and Capitalism in New York City, which I’m looking forward to reading and which, of course, is the book whose book party the great Ben McGrath covered for Talk of the Town:

Exactly what the full range of party chatter was is tough to say, because a variety of languages were spoken, but an interloper, with a little persistence, was able to discern that most drivers would probably disagree with the cheery characterization of the yellow cab (made at a recent design forum at Parsons) as “New York’s movable public space.” A fairer, if blunter, slogan might be: “Our workspace, where you annoy and disrespect us.”

“They treat the car like they’re slobs,” a driver whose handle on the Bengal Cabbie Association’s CB radio channel is Babar said of his passengers. He added that those who sit in the front seat, and who make radio requests, are usually drunk. Drunk passengers occasionally throw up, and the smell lingers for weeks.

“There are so many things,” Rizwan Raja, a Pakistani driver, said, rattling off a list of his pet peeves: putting one’s feet up on the partition, smoking, crossing the street lackadaisically. Requesting multiple stops is also frowned upon. “These people come out of expensive, posh bars, where one beer is twenty dollars, but they make groups together so they can share a taxi and save a couple of dollars,” Raja said. “ ‘Three stops’—that really, really blows me off.” Tips, ever since the fare increase, have been meagre: “Sometimes forty cents, sometimes twenty cents.”

Raja went on, “The worst is when they ask, ‘Where are you from?’ Once you answer that question, then it’s ‘What is the relationship between Al Qaeda and the Pakistani government?’ ” Raja, who says he is asked that question “almost every day,” has recommended that his passengers see “Fahrenheit 9/11.”

A storm is coming, Frank says…

I’m living in the future, the present, and the past all at once. It’s very Donnie Darko. What I mean is, you might want to revisit the Brandenn Bremmer and the Karl “I Could Eat a Knob at Night” Pilkington posts, which have been expanded and commented on quite a lot since they were first posted. They may be from the past, but they’re living in the moment. As they say somewhere else online, join the fray!

The Comic Critic's

The Comic Critic: Donnie Darko [Mark Monlux]