Martin Schneider writes:
The details for the New Yorker Conference are here—everything that’s scheduled for the two days of events on May 7 and 8. The dedicated website also lists bios of the participants, and more. As always, Emdashes is proud to be able to provide comprehensive coverage of the event, so stay tuned!
Here’s the schedule:
Thursday, May 8
7:30 a.m.-8:55 a.m.
Registration and Breakfast
9:00 a.m.-9:10 a.m.
Welcome by David Remnick
9:10 a.m.-9:40 a.m.
“Reinventing Invention”
Keynote Address by Malcolm Gladwell
9:45 a.m.-10:05 a.m.
“The Green City”
Dana Goodyear talks with Gavin Newsom
10:10 a.m.-10:30 a.m.
“A More Perfect Union”
James Surowiecki talks with Andy Stern
10:35 a.m.-11:00 a.m.
“23 and You”
Michael Specter talks with Linda Avey and Anne Wojicki
11:05 a.m.-11:30 a.m.
BREAK
11:40 a.m.-12:05 p.m.
“Creative Intelligence”
Jane Mayer talks with Eric Haseltine
12:10 p.m.-12:30 p.m.
“Neurobiotics: Where Humans and Robots Connect”
Presentation by Yoky Matsuoka
12:35 p.m.-1:05 p.m.
“Making Musicals Rock”
Susan Morrison talks with Duncan Sheik
1:10 p.m.-2:40 p.m.
LUNCH
2:50 p.m.-3:10 p.m.
“The Centre for Massive Change”
Presentation by Bruce Mau
3:15 p.m.-3:35 p.m.
“Constructing Culture”
Thelma Golden talks with David Adjaye
3:40 p.m.-4:10 p.m.
“Playing with Fire”
Bill Buford talks with David Chang, Daniel Humm, and Marc Taxiera
4:15 p.m.-4:35 p.m.
“How Bad Is It?: A Global View”
Nick Paumgarten talks with Michael Novogratz
4:40 p.m.-5:10 p.m.
BREAK
5:20 p.m.-5:40 p.m.
“Humanitarian Engineering”
Rebecca Mead talks with Amy Smith
5:45 p.m.-6:05 p.m.
“The Politics of Glamour”
Michael Specter talks with Francesco Vezzoli
6:10 p.m.-6:55 p.m.
COCKTAIL RECEPTION
7:15 p.m.-9:15 p.m.
DINNER at Eyebeam
Friday, May 9
7:45 a.m.-8:30 a.m.
BREAKFAST
8:40 a.m.-9:00 a.m.
“The Past, Present, and Future of Humor”
Presentation by Robert Mankoff
9:05 a.m.-9:30 a.m.
“Deconstructing the Airport”
Malcolm Gladwell talks with Paco Underhill
9:35 a.m.-9:55 a.m.
“Saving the World Through Game Design”
Daniel Zalewski talks with Jane McGonigal
10:00 a.m.-10:20 a.m.
“The Forever Campaign”
Ryan Lizza talks with Rahm Emanuel
10:25 a.m.-10:55 a.m.
BREAK
11:05 a.m.-11:25 a.m.
“The Tanning of America”
Kelefa Sanneh talks with Steve Stoute
11:30 a.m.-11:50 a.m.
“Securing the City”
William Finnegan talks with Raymond W. Kelly
11:55 a.m.-12:15 p.m.
“The Knockoff Economy”
James Surowiecki talks with Scott Hemphill and Kal Raustiala
12:20 p.m.-12:40 p.m.
“True Stories”
Jeffrey Toobin talks with Sheila Nevins
12:45 p.m.-2:00 p.m.
LUNCH
2:10 p.m.-2:30 p.m.
“Opera: Coming Soon to a Theatre Near You”
Alex Ross talks with Peter Gelb
2:35 p.m.-2:55 p.m.
“The Post-American World”
David Remnick talks with Fareed Zakaria
Monthly Archives: April 2008
Eating People Is Wrong
Here’s a mildly inaccurate but, for those of us who like silly wordplay, decent cannibalism joke starring The New Yorker, courtesy of Comedy Central and of the polymathic Ben Bass, who sent me the link.
It’s Summer Intern Time at Emdashes; Apply Today!
The last time we advertised for an intern, we got the incredibly talented John Bucher, who did his noble service and is now a contributing writer. I have no doubt he’ll go far.
Now, however, we must look to the future. If you’re a serious reader of The New Yorker, have a solid grasp of and appreciation for English syntax and punctuation, know at least enough HTML to get by, and have a bit of experience with blogging (even if you’re just an avid reader of blogs), and would like an unpaid but often entertaining position learning more about all of the above and doing some research and writing, please get in touch with Emily care of emdashes.com. You need not live in New York, but it would be a plus if you did.
Feministing Takes a Crack at the Caption Contest
Two guys are walking down the street and one of them is carrying a blow-up doll. He says…
a) one of the snappy answers the commenters at Feministing came up with for the P. C. Vey drawing in the latest Cartoon Caption Contest, e.g., “The Law Firm of DeadGuy, DeadGuy, RetiredGuy, and OldGuy presents its first female partner”; b) an entry—perhaps, most printably, “I just happen to like knit ties”—from Daniel Radosh’s reliably raucous Anti-Caption Contest for the same drawing; or c) Something hilarious you thought of, but keep in mind entries are due April 27.
Also, if you didn’t see last year’s Lars and the Real Girl, you missed something truly wonderful. Move to Top of Queue, and you’ll never see blow-up dolls the same way again. (Thanks to Katha for the Feministing link.)
In a Battle Between the Hulk and Superman
…the Hulk would win, according to a charming and confident young man of ten I met yesterday in a brief tour of the Comic Con, where I focused on book publishers and sightings, as with a bird book, of Gothic Lolitas, hipster dads, and redheaded gentlemen. I was hoping to get a chance to see Caroline Kelly (animator, artist, and daughter of Walt), whom the Fantagraphics folks said was nearby, but I had to skedaddle.
Back to the contest above. I’m very far from being an expert in this field, but as I asked the young man in question, why would Superman bother with the Hulk in the first place? And would the Hulk be smart enough to bring Kryptonite?
Which leads me to the next point, which is, don’t miss Nancy Franklin’s recent piece on The Hills and other dwelling places of muscular but dim specimens of easily enraged, tightly clothed, questionably gifted, and sometimes amusing humankind.
In Praise of Shirley Hazzard
Rereading Shirley Hazzard’s The Transit of Venus (1980), I found it difficult to adjust to her elliptical, portentous narrative style. After a few pages, however, something clicked, and I realized I was reading a master work: indirect but smoothly and intelligently told, with compelling characters and gorgeous prose.
In brief scenes densely packed with revealing detail and irony, the novel covers the lives of two Australian sisters, Caroline (or “Caroâ€) and Grace, orphaned as girls in 1938, who embark upon their romantic lives when they arrive in London, all grown up, some years after the end of World War II.
Caro receives the lion’s share of the novel’s attention—Hazzard clearly prefers her self-possession and independence of mind. She is pursued throughout the book (and her life) by an astronomer named Ted Tice, who, like Hazzard, idolizes Caro. She doesn’t reciprocate his passion, and most of the book is about love affairs with two other men; yet Ted is nothing if not constant, and he meets her from time to time, still hoping.
I have to stop a moment, though, and observe that the problem with this sort of summary—the problem with the summary of any novel—is that it typically fails to convey the book’s unique attractions. Because Transit is primarily concerned with the romantic lives of its characters, you may have concluded that I’ve latched on to some early species of “chick lit.” Hardly. In fact, it’s a tragedy, though the ending is so oblique that readers sometimes miss it.
Fortunately, you don’t have to take my recommendation on faith: you can fire up the Complete New Yorker and see for yourself. Hazzard published four excerpts from Transit in The New Yorker: “A Long Story Short†(July 26, 1976), “A Crush on Doctor Dance†(September 26, 1977; hilariously categorized under “dance†in the CNY), “Something You’ll Remember Always†(September 17, 1979), and “She Will Make You Very Happy†(November 26, 1979).
As a set, these four stories work remarkably well. “Something You’ll Remember Always†does a marvelously economical job of showing Grace and Caro’s childhood; Grace is courted by Christian Thrale in “She Will Make You Very Happyâ€; years after they marry, Christian has an affair with a secretary in his office, which he ends with brutal coldness, as we learn in “A Long Story Shortâ€; and then Grace herself, unaware of Christian’s affair, falls in love with the family pediatrician in “A Crush on Doctor Dance,†though the good doctor’s principles and her own timidity conspire to keep their relationship unconsummated and brief.
To give you a sense of Hazzard’s gifts, I offer this passage from “Something You’ll Remember Always.†It begins with a verse that refers to the reversal of the seasons between England in the northern hemisphere and Australia in the southern: spring starts in September. Hazzard goes on:
You might recite it in Elocution class, but could hardly have it in English Poetry. It was as if the poet had deliberately taken the losing, and the Australian side…. What was natural was hedgerows, hawthorn, skylarks, the chaffinch on the orchard bough. You had never seen these but believed in them with perfect faith. As you believed, also, in the damp, deciduous, and rightful seasons of English literature and in lawns of emerald velours, or in flowers that could only be grown in Australia when the drought broke and with top-dressing. Literature had not simply made these things true. It had placed Australia in perpetual, flagrant violation of reality.
In that single paragraph, Hazzard captures the attitudes of two societies, English and Australian. But this is a story that is at least partly about the transference of cultural hegemony from Britain to America. So things are changing. Before World War II, little girls in Australia might sing,
Come down to Kew in lilac-time
(it isn’t far from London!)
But then the war arrives, bringing with it American soldiers (who “could not provide history, of which they were almost as destitute as the Australiansâ€) and plastic gimcracks:
It was the first encounter with calculated uselessness…. The natural accoutrements of their lives were now seen to have been essentials—serviceable, workaday—in contrast to these hard, high-colored, unblinking objects that announced, though brittle enough, the indestructibility of infinite repetition….
Never did they dream, fingering those toys and even being, in a rather grownup way, amused by them, that they were handling fateful signals of the future.It was not long after this that the girls began to wave their unformed hips and to chant about Chattanooga and the San Fernando Valley. Sang, from the antipodes, about being down in Havana and down Mexico way. Down was no longer down to Kew. The power of Kew was passing like an empire.
Definitely not fluff.
Also introduced in “Something You’ll Remember Always,†is Dora, Caro and Grace’s half-sister. Twenty-two when the death of their parents thrusts the two younger girls into her care, she is gradually revealed to be narcissistic and emotionally draining. “Keeping up emotional appearances,†Hazzard writes, “they were learning to appease and watch out for her. Dora’s flaring responses to error might now be feared, or any kindling of her enchafed spirit.â€
“Enchafed spiritâ€â€”what an amazing phrase. But there’s more:
She said she could do away with herself. Or she could disappear. Who would care, what would it matter. They flung themselves on her in terror, Dora don’t die, Dora don’t disappear. No, she was adamant: it was the only way.
How often, often, she drew upon this inexhaustible reserve of her own death, regenerated over and over by the horror she inspired by showing others the very brink. It was from their ashen fear that she rose, every time, a phoenix. Each such borrowing from death gave her a new lease on life.
And that’s Dora, perfectly drawn with a touch of irony. When Grace’s future husband, Christian, meets Dora in “She Will Make You Very Happy,†he observes to himself, “She was one of those persons who will squeeze into the same partition of a revolving door with you, on the pretext of causing less trouble.†Zing!
Christian, in turn, is given little quarter. A methodical young bureaucrat, he makes an uncharacteristically impetuous decision to attend a concert, where he meets Grace and makes a date to call on her. When he arrives, Caro is there as well.
He found these women uncommonly self-possessed for their situation. They seemed scarcely conscious of being Australians in a furnished flat. He would have liked them to be more impressed by his having come, and instead caught himself living up to what he thought might be their standards and hoping they would not guess the effort incurred. Quickness came back to him like a neglected talent summoned in an emergency: as if he rose in trepidation to a platform and cleared his throat to sing.
Christian’s snobbery is evident; the scene comes alive, however, because the sisters are sure of their dignity. So sure, in fact, that he can’t play the lordly Englishman, deigning to call on the colonials. It galls him a little that they’ve not made special preparations for his visit. “A room where there had been expectation would have conveyed the fact—by a tension of plumped cushions and placed magazines, a vacancy from unseemly objects bundled out of sight; by suspense slowly dwindling in the curtains.†But he is not in such a room.
Still, he can’t help who he is, and he manages only to tone down his condescension, rather than stifle it altogether. Momentarily, he realizes that “he was the one in need of rescue, that Grace might easily do better than take up with him…. But health was hard to maintain: self-importance flickered up like fever.â€
And there you’ve got Christian.
These are fine, believable characters, caught and held in Hazzard’s exquisite prose. To enjoy them yourself, I strongly recommend you find her book. But these four stories make an excellent introduction.
Interview With Francoise Mouly: Hooked on Comics
For Print magazine, a quick glimpse at the debut of TOON Books, the winsome passion project of the RAW co-founder and New Yorker art editor.
An Elevator Romance
That’s the name of a 1911 movie whose IMDb plot synopsis is empty. I bet Robert Benchley saw it at the time, though. He probably followed it up with a short subject called “How to Make Love in an Elevator.” (Get your mind out of the gutter—back then “making love” was more like bundling.)
Anyway, another elevator romance is Nick Paumgarten’s, as demonstrated in his engaging story last week about the curious vertical conveyances in which people stand at genetically predetermined distances. As I read it, I remembered that I’d written something about Paumgarten and elevators before, and it was in 2005, when I was testing out the urban myth he reported on in the October 17 issue of that year. To wit:
Supposedly, if an elevator passenger simultaneously presses the “door close†button and the button for the floor he is trying to reach, he can override the requests of other passengers and of people waiting for the elevator on other floors. The elevator shifts into express mode, racing directly to the floor of his choosing—becoming, in essence, a private lift. Apparently (that is, according to Internet chatter and what you might call secondhand anecdotal evidence), people (pizza men, college students, hotel guests) have been doing this for years, which might explain why the rest of us have occasionally had the feeling that elevators were passing us by.
The experts, however, say that the idea is nonsense, that elevators are not designed to do this, that people are talking crazy.
I did the experiment myself in the Condé Nast building at the time. Did it work? See for yourself! And try it in an elevator near you; let me know what happens. But don’t get stuck. It just goes to show you that no one should ever go anywhere without a good, long book, just in case.
By the way, how about that stylishly trippy photo by Maurizio Cattelan that accompanied the most recent elevator piece? He doesn’t seem to have a website, but I see from this lowercased interview that “cattelan did not attend art school but taught himself. he worked as a cook, gardener, nurse and mortuary attendant, before turning to making art with the hope that the art world might offer him ‘better treatment’.” How’s that for a love story, huh?
Franzen Thinks Big about Floridian Plovers and Chinese Gulls
Martin Schneider writes:
The website bigthink.com has just put up a bunch of entertaining clips featuring the full-throated inflections of Jonathan Franzen. There’s one on his difficulties accepting Oprah’s endorsement in 2001, a pair on over- (Forster, Greene) and underrated (Smiley, Stead) books, and a few on China. And there are some I haven’t even mentioned!
I’m a recent devotee of birdwatching, so I choose to single out Franzen’s “Idea” in which he reads a portion of his glum and illuminating essay, “My Bird Problem,” (abstract only) which first appeared in the August 8, 2005, issue of The New Yorker:
I took up birdwatching after this essay was published, so I’m grateful for the reminder!
Other New Yorker luminaries featured on bigthink.com include David Remnick (as we have already pointed out), Calvin Trillin, and Paul Muldoon.
I Am Hanging in the Balance of the Reality of Man
You’ll want to listen to the playlist that Daniel Radosh has helpfully assembled to accompany his list for Paper Cuts, Dwight Garner’s Times book blog, of “10 great Christian rock songs. Really. I know what you’re thinking.”
And speaking of saviors, there’s a lovely story in the Washington City Paper today about Julie Tate, ace news researcher for the Washington Post and former fact-checker at The New Yorker. I love behind-the-scenes pieces about magazines and newspapers, and this is a good one. Whatever is to become of the daily paper, reminding readers how essential classic reporting and researching skills are, and introducing them to the people who make those skills an art, will help the profession change forms more gracefully and (I hope) with more accuracy and honor.
