![]()
Click on the cartoon to enlarge it!
Read “The Wavy Rule” archive.
Monthly Archives: March 2009
Best of the 03.02.09 Issue: Hive Mind
Martin Schneider writes:
Ivan Brunetti’s adorable presentation of cubicle life was on the cover. Features included Ryan Lizza’s report on Rahm Emanuel, Rebecca Mead’s Profile on soprano Natalie Dessay, and Steve Koll’s investigation of tensions between Pakistan and India.
Wallace Week at The New Yorker: The Good and the Bad
_Martin Schneider writes:_
Love the prospect of an in-depth “article”:http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2009/03/09/090309fa_fact_max?currentPage=all about the last days of David Foster Wallace, by D.T. Max. Not so comfortable with the unfinished “work”:http://www.newyorker.com/fiction/features/2009/03/09/090309fi_fiction_wallace?currentPage=all.
You’ve Been Collectively Poked: The Emdashes Facebook Group
“Emdashes has now stormed into the world of Facebook!”:http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=132214570367&ref=ts&nectar_impid=7c3d4ab7cba6257d3a737a3312353f34 Yes, we are building champagne pyramids and doing the Charleston on a social connecting website that is known to everyone on and off this planet (the International Space Station also has a Facebook page). Feel free to join and become friends with all of the Emdashes staff.
Sempé Fi (On Covers): The Office
![]()
_Pollux writes_:
The color gray dominates Ivan Brunetti‘s bird’s-eye-view of a typical American cube farm on the cover of _The New Yorker_ for March 2, 2009. In this corporate necropolis of worthless PCs, dried-out water coolers, filthy coffee pots, and nauseating microwaveable meals, the wheels of American commerce fitfully turn like those on a rusty pump trolley. Even more defective than the machinery are the workers themselves: they weep, sleep, drink coffee, throw around office equipment, argue, and suffer termination, germophobia, and Post-it Note overload. They look for shoes and romance, both of the online and office varieties, and dance fitfully at a potluck. They get caught looking at pornography and lose precious time as the bespectacled Help Desk Guy dismantles their computer with a ruthless drill.
Brunetti’s “Ecosystem” is a corporate world that at first glance seems to be a beehive of industry and activity, but we soon come to an awful conclusion about this American workplace: little work is actually being done. In the sickly gasps of a failing economy, we hear verses, through a defective intercom system, from Alighieri’s _Inferno_: “Here heartsick sighs and groanings and shrill cries / Re-echoed through the air devoid of stars.”
I wish this world were imaginary, for the U.S. economy’s sake, but as a reluctant inhabitant of this type of purgatory myself, I find Brunetti’s vision all too familiar. I have witnessed a Mardi Gras Potluck in which managers and supervisors walked around in feathered carnival masks while workers happily clipped their fingernails, checked Facebook for the umpteenth time, made multiple trips to the break room for bratwurst, Lay’s Potato Chips, and stomach-churning lumps of cheese and steak, and looked forward to a night of office-sponsored glow-in-the-dark miniature golfing.
By a trick of perspective we look at Brunetti’s egg-headed, stick-limbed figures not from above, but follow them on a downward trajectory as if in “an etching by Piranesi.”:http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/29/Piranesi9c.jpg All are locked in their compartments, doomed to scamper endlessly on a hamster wheel they themselves have maintained. The artist’s cartoon figures, normally subjected to the most wicked and outrageous torments (see, for example, his book HAW!: Horrible, Horrible Cartoons), now participate in the most perverse ordeal of all: the daily routine of office life.
Review Roundup: Cheever, Orwell Receive Boost, Yawn
Martin Schneider writes:
In the New York Times Magazine, Charles McGrath (father of Ben) makes the case that John Cheever is sorely due for a revival. Since he’s better than the recently canonized Richard Yates, this does seem both likely and proper. The success of Mad Men, set in Ossining, Cheever’s hometown, should help.
Meanwhile, the otherwise excellent New York Review of Books brings us Julian Barnes’s fatuous review of the new George Packer editions of George Orwell’s essays. I’m an Orwell nut of long standing, dedicated my (poor) senior thesis to his work, have committed the CEJL to memory (true Orwell fanatics instantly recognize that abbreviation), and grow impatient with Barnes’s denigrating tone and determination to ignore the volumes under review. Both Georges deserve better.
