Monthly Archives: April 2005

(4.18.05 issue) Lizard music

3. ON THE RUN

Winter hours, white
dune grass.
Secret
pinewoods to the ocean—now what?

Franz Wright has a point (in this week’s “Four Poems of Youth”), but he needn’t worry. The answer is clearly back-country skiing. As a supplement to Nick Paumgarten’s “Dangerous Game: A ski mountaineer and a history of tragedy” (which isn’t online, sorry), you can read up on the sporty suicide’s dream hobby here on the travel-writing blog Gadling.

By the way, does anyone else find Lawrence Osborne’s “Letter From New Guinea” a little offputting? His tone reminds me of ethnographies that were already musty when I was in college, and the disclaimers about the fetishization of “first contacts” and romanticization of the noble savage—not to mention phony “primitivist spectacles” staged for precisely this kind of thrill-seeking tourist—are key points but feel like an afterthought. Nevertheless, the stories are great, especially about the forests’ various creatures, like a rare lizard (the comely emerald tree monitor) who’s instantly transformed from nature-special material into something quite different:

The youths jumped on the dazed reptile and gaily beat out its brain with sticks. Holding it up by its tail, they showed it off—a huge, three-foot specimen with jewel-like markings—while blood dripped from its tongue. This would be their dinner, it appeared…. The island’s beautiful parrots proved a still more anguishing problem. The porters liked them roasted on spits.

The placement of New Yorker ads often leads to funny juxtapositions, and there are several in this piece alone; Osbourne’s close attention to penis gourds gives a new meaning to “European sophistication. Tropical dress code” (Lago Mar ad, p. 130). And having just gotten over the idea of a breakfast of roasted mouse legs—”so small that we had to eat thirty of them to satisfy our hunger. They had a vile taste, a cross between stale pork and licorice”—the reader may no longer be in the mood for a box of sixteen “signature mice,” handmade in chocolate by L.A. Burdick (p. 135). Not to mention that the new Qantas ads that have been showing up in the magazine and elsewhere lately (p. 125) feature people who come neither from America nor New Guinea, nor Earth. These two should have contributed a Letter From Space.

The Kombai with whom Osbourne and his fellows make contact seem intensely acclimated to the ways of Westerners in one regard: One man in a hornbill penis gourd tells them through a translator, “When we saw you, we thought, What is that?…Then we were mad. Then we were scared.” If that’s not a description of people-watching in New York, I don’t know what is.

In the New Yorker! [Gadling]
Penis Gourd Gallery [Rhymer; you must]

R.I.P., A.D.

Andrea Dworkin has died, and all the bloggers are talking. The question is, will andrea_dworkin, the ambivalent love-hunter on Spring Street Networks (which administers the Salon and Nerve personals, among others), expire as well? I noticed her about a year ago, and she appears to be going strong (if not especially active). Some highlights from the profile:

Occupation: professional victim

Cigarettes: Sometimes
Booze: Sometimes
Drugs: Sometimes
Self-love: Often
Self-deprecation: Often

Most humbling moment:
the defeat of the PVCA (Pornography Victim’s Compensation Act) in 1993.

Favorite on-screen sex scene:
sex is filthy, violent and demeaning to all women.

If I could be anywhere at the moment:
anywhere with my hands around the throat of susie bright.

Song or album that puts me in the mood:
these boots were made for walkin’

The five items I can’t live without:
my fucked up system of morals
my hair
copies of my books
susie bright effigy
my ego

Fill in the blanks: ambiguity is sexy; asexuality is sexier

In my bedroom, you’ll find: two beds

It’s not exactly a nuanced portrait, but I happen to know that at least a few men (not women’s studies majors, it’s reasonable to assume) fell for the anonymous prankster’s ruse and wrote to the un-Andrea with ire and confusion. She would’ve liked that, I think.

Andrea Dworkin, 1946-2005 [Slate]
The Passion of Andrea Dworkin [Salon]

Really Briefly Noted: Atlas, shrugged off

New feature! Books, new and not, by New Yorker authors. Today, what excommunication was like for one unlucky literary soul:

It was probably inevitable that James Atlas, a well-known writer, would present himself in his memoirs as a wretched loser. These days, even big-time executives complain that “the system” has done them wrong, and wealthy athletes whine about a few harsh words from coaches or sports writers. So why shouldn’t James Atlas make My Life in the Middle Ages: A Survivor’s Tale (HarperCollins), which might have been written as a chronicle of success, into a 220-page lament for his ego? He’s learned how to transform defeat into something grand and theatrical.

A few years ago, something tragic happened to Atlas: In middle age he was fired from his job. A staff writer on The New Yorker, he had been hired in the Tina Brown era and apparently never adjusted to the requirements of her successor, David Remnick. He wasn’t turning out what Remnick wanted. So Remnick fired him, explaining that the money he was paying Atlas would go to a more productive writer.

Something like this has happened to most of us. It is never nice. Keep going…

The mind of the self-mad man [National Post, Canada]

Seattle events: Mankoff 4/19, Frere-Jones 4/14

I don’t check The New Yorker Near You often enough either, so I’m posting these listings as I see them. Of course, confirm dates and times with the venues.

Sponsored by Foolproof, New Yorker cartoon editor Robert Mankoff appears at Town Hall to discuss the publication’s nearly 69,000 cartoons, and how he culled the best of them for a massive new compilation. 1119 Eighth Ave., 206-325-3554. $15. 7:30 p.m. Tues., April 19.

Also in the listings: Tony Kushner, Shakti Butler, Lars Vilks, Sister Helen Prejean, Miriam Rajkumar, Noam Chomsky, and Welcome the Whales Day! Seattle has its priorities straight.

Update: Sasha Frere-Jones is moderating a panel at the EMP Pop Conference tomorrow:

Eric Lott et al., “Love and Theft Revisited” (Liquid Lounge, 7:15 p.m. Thursday). Lott’s highly regarded minstrelsy study, Love and Theft, provided Bob Dylan with the title of his 2001 album. It also gives a focus to this panel, moderated by EMP’s Eric Weisbard and featuring The New Yorker‘s Sasha Frere-Jones, Stagolee Shot Billy author Cecil Brown, Princeton’s Daphne Brooks, and Songs in the Key of Black Life author Mark Anthony Neal, among others.

Brain City: Very Picky This Week [Seattle Weekly]
A Pop Conference Top 10 [Seattle Weekly]

All roads lead to Jonathan

So you know now which Jonathan it is who’s in the current issue: the shape-shifting Franzen. But many of us in the grip of New Yorker love (not unlike Jimmy Fallon’s for the Red Sox in the Fever Pitch movie or Nick Hornby’s for Arsenal in the book, in that it’s a force of constancy without which our lives would become shabby and crumpled) would have been more or less satisfied with any of them. By which I mean, of course, Lethem, Franzen, and Safran Foer.

Strangely, so often left out of the Jonathan Mafia (a term I use with the utmost affection, I assure you), though—at least by those who prefer life in tidy triangles—is the fearless author of, among others, Wake Up, Sir!, What’s Not To Love? and The Extra Man. That’s Jonathan Ames. What’s not to love, indeed, so I hereby nominate Ames for induction into the public secret society. Perhaps Dave Eggers could whip up an anthology? (See last quoted line of an interview with Ames by Sarah Stodola, below.) There may well be a ripe young Jonathan right now scribbling and coughing in his garret, pining for a chance to be one of the Jonathans. Don’t expire—we’re all waiting for you!

SS: And also, why are there so many male novelists named Jonathan these days (in addition to you and Foer, Lethem also comes immediately to mind, and Franzen)?

JA: I once addressed this in an essay for Bookforum and I wrote that I was like the weird brother in this family of brothers named Jonathan, that I was the pin-headed one who would go missing but then would be found in the woods screwing sap-holes in trees. I somehow saw this as a Medieval family of brothers named Jonathan. But I had to cut that paragraph because of the word-count. I don’t know where that paragraph might be. And I forget the exact topic of the essay, but it was something about how I screwed up my literary career by choosing the wrong subtitle for my memoir, What’s Not to Love? The subtitle was/is: The Adventures of a Mildly Perverted Young Writer. At the time I thought it would be catchy, but the result has been to see the word pervert associated repeatedly with my name. And so I had come to realize (in the Bookforum essay) that I was bad at marketing—that using the word “genius” as Dave Eggers had done was a much better idea.

SS: Yeah, I don’t think anyone who would like to remain sane should try to compete with Eggers in the arena of marketing…

JA: Not trying to compete. I admire D. Eggers. He’s remarkable in many different ways.

You Once Said: An Interview with Jonathan Ames [Me Three]

Categories:

The New Yorker, the cocktail?

Coming up: My first, but by no means my last, review of life and love (of steak) at the Algonquin Hotel. Plus, a celebrity encounter! No, not Donald Antrim, but read his short story from last week anyway. “But I never read the fiction!” Whatever you say, but read this one for me. A week later it’s still hovering just outside my thoughts, occasionally knocking lightly at the door, asking if it can come in. And I always say yes. You’ll see.
Note from the future: The celebrity, who was staying at the hotel and told me about his surrealistic new play, was Dominique Pinon. Remember him from Amélie?

(4.18.05 issue) Ski bums

The New York Post on the travel issue:

The New Yorker‘s first-ever travel issue is out—let’s hope it is the last one. We don’t like reading about where the sons and daughters of the fabulously wealthy spend their vacations. Nick Paumgarten skiing on avalanche-prone mountains, for instance. Well, that’s really smart. Then we hear his family has pursued this sport for generations, even though two family members have been killed. Get down off the mountain, Paumgarten, and please take the rest of the crackpots who contributed to this lame concept with you! What a flagrant way to try to con the travel industry out of some ads while insouciant journalists do little reporting.

Well, the word “hazardous” is in the subhed. Can every contributor to the issue be a son or daughter of the fabulously wealthy? Nicole Krauss, Jonathan Franzen, Jane Smiley, Mary Gordon? As for luxury sports, go up to Sugarbush sometime to watch the stoned snowmakers fly blind down the mountain at night. You don’t have to be a Kennedy or a Bono to do dumb things on skis!

And here’s Slate with a less angry critique:

For this “Journeys” issue, Tad Friend travels to Oman alongside Lonely Planet mogul Tony Wheeler and his wife Maureen; along the way, Friend evaluates the guidebooks’ cultural impact (U.S. forces used LP to figure out which sites they shouldn’t bomb in Iraq) and notes, “like Apple and Starbucks and Ben & Jerry’s, all of which began as plucky alternatives, Lonely Planet has become a mainstream brand.” … The author of a “Letter from New Guinea” describes going on a guided tour into the rainforest and meeting members of a tribe that hadn’t encountered white tourists before. (Predictably, a naked tribesman asks the tourists, “Shall we wrap your penises?”) … A profile of Brazilian economist-turned-photographer Sebastiao Salgado examines his quest to photograph Antarctica. … And Jonathan Franzen, Jane Smiley, and others recall memorable family vacations. —B.B. [Bidisha Banerjee]

Remember in the ’90s when all those booksellers and beer companies and clothing stores hid behind made-up “plucky alternatives” to lure in mall-fearing independent types? Now they don’t have to—everyone loves their chains so so much. I want you to look me in the eye and tell me Starbucks coffee tastes good. I mean not with soy milk, not with foam, not with sugar, not with caramel, not with mint, not with bourbon, not with ice cream. Just the coffee. No, it doesn’t taste good, does it? So if you live in New York, go to Oren’s already!

Update: From my friend Lisa of the luscious links, the Delocator, which lets you type in your zip code and find all the non-Starbucks caffeine joints near you. Via Stayfree, and just what the coffee doctor ordered.

Bad ‘Reader’-Keeping [NY Post]
What Do Condi, Jon Stewart, and Jay-Z Have in Common? [Slate]
Ski Resort Tycoon [PC Games]
Push Back Starbucks! [Church of Stop Shopping]

(4.18.05 issue) Because I love you

Here are this week’s contents. Links to come later—if you’re in Manhattan and you don’t have a Ziggy doom cloud over your head, you’ll see these very articles on the printed page in no time! I like the look of this one—oh, I see, it’s the travel issue. Good timing! I’m about to travel a long way myself and I’ll need it for the plane. What already oodles my noodle:

Tad Friend (twice!), David Sedaris (speak of the devil), Lawrence Osborne, Ian Parker on Sebastiao Salgado (I worked on a book of his photos, and he is quite amazing; hey, there’s an online-only slide show!), John McPhee, the “Are We There Yet?” quartet (includes one of the Jonathan Mafia, but you have to look to see which), Steven Shapin, Alex Ross, David Denby on Fever Pitch (which I saw and was tickled by last night), Seamus Heaney. In cartoons, another Roz Chast “Back Page”! Can’t wait to get my hands on these: Gahan Wilson, Charles Barsotti, Bruce Eric Kaplan, and Edward Koren. As Rufus Wainwright would say, my phone’s on vibrate for you.

JOURNEYS
Goings on About Town
Talk of the Town

COMMENT: WASTED ENERGY
Elizabeth Kolbert on the fight over drilling in Alaska.

DEPT. OF MERGERS: WINNERS
Rebecca Mead reports from Mr. and Mrs. Jack Welch’s book party, at the Four Seasons.

DEPT. OF NOISEMAKING: THE ANGRY INVESTOR
Ben McGrath on Daniel Loeb and what complaint letters will get you.

LEGACIES: THE NUT LADY RETURNS
Tad Friend on a showdown in the Nutmeg State.

THE FINANCIAL PAGE: IN YUAN WE TRUST
James Surowiecki on where America’s currency is headed.

OUR FAR-FLUNG CORRESPONDENTS: Tad Friend
The Parachute Artist: How Lonely Planet changed travel.

REFLECTIONS: David Sedaris
Keeping Up: Why does he always lose me?

THE SPORTING SCENE: Nick Paumgarten
Dangerous Game: The hazardous allure of backcountry skiing.

LETTER FROM NEW GUINEA: Lawrence Osborne
Strangers in the Forest: A guided tour to an isolated tribe.

PROFILES: Ian Parker
A Cold Light: Sebastiao Salgado sails to Antarctica.

ANNALS OF TRANSPORT: John McPhee
Out in the Sort: UPS and the art of moving everything.

FICTION: Ludmila Ulitskaya, “The Orlov-Sokolovs”

ARE WE THERE YET?
Nicole Krauss—My Summer in Poland
Jonathan Franzen—Countdown
Jane Smiley—Cold Front
Mary Gordon—Pilgrimage

THE CRITICS/BOOKS
Joan Acocella—Sybille Bedford’s travels.
Steven Shapin—Doping and sports.
Briefly Noted

THE THEATRE: Hilton Als
Jane Alexander plays Djuna Barnes.

MUSICAL EVENTS: Alex Ross
Harry Partch’s “Oedipus.”

THE CURRENT CINEMA: David Denby
“Kontroll,” “Fever Pitch.”

POEMS
Seamus Heaney—“In Iowa”
Franz Wright—“Four Poems of Youth”
Dana Goodyear—“The Above-the-Sea World of Jacques Cousteau”

THE BACK PAGE: Roz Chast, “Travelogue”

COVER: Bruce McCall, “Joys of Travel”

DRAWINGS: Lee Lorenz, Frank Cotham, David Sipress, Robert Weber, Alex Gregory, Barbara Smaller, Leo Cullum, Jack Ziegler, Mike Twohy, Carolita Johnson, Eric Lewis, Drew Dernavich, William Hamilton, Danny Shanahan, Victoria Roberts, Gahan Wilson, P. C. Vey, Charles Barsotti, Bruce Eric Kaplan, Edward Koren, Robert Mankoff, Jason Patterson, Matthew Diffee

SPOTS: Joost Swarte

Categories: ,

(3.28.05 issue) Scalia, Scalia, I once met a judge named Scalia…

Catching up with Editor and Punisher, I see they did a funny potty-mouthed (such an enduringly weird expression) “translation” of Amy Davidson’s questions for Margaret Talbot from an online-only interview about her recent Antonin Scalia profile.

Davidson’s line of questioning is essentially a series of permutations of the aforementioned big question:

Davidson: Why is he such a polarizing figure?
Translation: Why do so many people think Scalia is such an asshole?

Davidson: Is it even clear that he believes in the separation of church and state?
Translation: Is it possible that’s he just a stupid shithead?

To her credit, Talbot maintains her equanimity, offering fair responses to rather tendentious questions…

And lots more along those lines, with commentary. If you suspect that I have some kind of aversion to cursing because I haven’t given you the more sailorish sections of the above post, not so. If you could get the inside of my head as an iTunes radio station, you’d hear some swearing you wouldn’t soon forget. Luckily for all of us, you can’t.

For fun, here’s another Editor and Punisher report on New Yorker history, Louis Menand on Eustace Tilley, and what E&P will do “if anyone ever describes us as ‘cultivated observers of life’s small beauties.’ ” Read “Of Monocle-Shattering Importance”—you know you want to.

Q. & A.: The Scalia Court [New Yorker, online only]
Supreme Asshole [Editor and Punisher]

(4.11.05 issue) Oh yes

I am definitely going to buy Sean Wilsey’s book when it comes out in June. As soon as I learned (from “Peace Is a Beautiful Thing,” if you lost the midsection of this week’s magazine through some hot-yoga mishap) that he’s a third-generation memoirist, that was already enough delicious trauma to get me hooked. I’m still only partway though the excerpt—I’m savoring it—but I’m thoroughly convinced the entire book will be this disas-tactular. Wilsey’s writing is a treat; throw in a confused Pope, joint custody, a pillow needlepointed “You can never be too thin or too rich,” Tab, divine visions, the music of the spheres, and a poison-pen columnist…it’s just great.

In an inspired but doomed Google search for an image of a pillow like the one described above, I found this useful note from a debunker of the origins of famous phrases:

Consider “You can never be too rich or too thin.” This maxim is associated with any number of wealthy, skinny women. It has been attributed to Rose Kennedy, Diana Vreeland, the Duchess of Windsor and Babe Paley. (The last two most often.) In the early 1970s the Duchess of Windsor, had it inscribed on a throw pillow. No matter how rich and thin she may have been, the Duchess was not particularly clever and is unlikely to have coined this phrase. Babe Paley is a more promising candidate. The comely wife of CBS founder William Paley was known for her tart tongue. But no credible evidence exists that she coined this remark. The most likely candidate of all is one to whom the maxim is seldom attributed: Truman Capote. According to quote maven Alec Lewis, Capote said he observed you can’t be too rich or thin on “The David Susskind Show” in the late 1950s (probably 1959). Since kinescopes of Susskind’s shows are tied up in litigation, this cannot be confirmed. Capote’s biographer Gerald Clarke told me he has no evidence that the writer originated this phrase, but that he very well might have. Capote was close to Babe Paley and could have fed her the line.

By the way, I’m reading some poems at 2:30 this afternoon in Shafer Hall and Rachael Rakes’ famed Frequency series at the Four-Faced Liar, where anybody who doesn’t know your name will shortly. Like poetry? Marianne Moore didn’t either! So come and have an ale, pale or less so.

Nice Guys Finish Seventh: False Phrases, Spurious Sayings, and Familiar Misquotations [Ralph Keyes]

Categories: , , ,