Monthly Archives: June 2005

Like butter

Q&A with Sean Wilsey in The Boston Globe. Oh the Glory of It All—which I’m now reading seriously, start to finish—is a marvel. You know how it’s a sin not to read certain books in, say, Italian or Japanese? This one’s worth learning English for. It makes me wish I were still teaching freshman comp. so I could assign some chapters to the little devils. Even the surly, sleepy undergraduates of NYU would be moved, and I hope they’d even wake up enough to see how hysterically funny sincerity can be. It’s inspiring writing, outlandishly true to the state of the post-Baby Boomer mind (often regressed, often old before its time, always kaleidoscopically referential to pop culture, Great Themes, and itself). If you’re married to the idea that your childhood was weird and fractured, filled with hostile mystery, be forewarned: You’re about to become (yikes!) normal.

Categories:

Longtime cover artist wins 2005 Pell

(c) Gretchen Dow Simpson

Bill Van Siclen writes in the Providence Journal:

Fans of painter Gretchen Dow Simpson, and there are many, know that she’s fascinated by architectural details: the zigzag play of light across a clapboard wall, for example, or the crisply minimalist lines of a classic New England farmhouse…. The new studio should provide plenty of room for Simpson to display her 2005 Pell Award, which she is to receive Friday at the annual awards ceremony and fundraiser sponsored by Trinity Repertory Company.

Now 66 (“and proud of it,” she says), Simpson is best know known for the cover illustrations she produced for the The New Yorker magazine between 1974 and 1995. During that period, her pared-down views of New England architecture appeared more than 60 times on the The New Yorker‘s cover—a remarkable run for an artist who dropped out of the Rhode Island School of Design after only two years.

“Basically, there was a lot of pressure from home,” she says. “Part of it was financial, since I had younger siblings at home who also wanted to go to college. Plus, I don’t think my parents really relished the idea of having an Abstract Expressionist painter for a daughter.”

After leaving RISD in 1959, Simpson got married and spent most of the next decade raising a family. Then, in 1974, she got a call from the The New Yorker‘s newly hired art director, Lee Lorenz, who had seen some of the cover illustrations Simpson had been submitting, on and off, since the mid-1960s.

“He told me that he liked the abstract stuff I was doing, but that it didn’t really fit what the magazine was looking for,” Simpson recalls. “He suggested trying something more realistic, but still with an abstract ‘feel.’ “

As for what Simpson should paint, Lorenz said simply: “Paint what you like.”

“Artistically, that was the big ‘aha’ moment,” Simpson says. “I started thinking: What do I really like? What do I want to paint? Eventually, I realized that having grown up in Cambridge [(Mass.)], I really liked New England architecture.”

Painter Simpson among Pell Award winners [Providence Journal]
Gretchen Dow Simpson covers [New Yorker Store]
New Yorker covers [Gretchen Dow Simpson]
“Block Island I” and “Nova Scotia II” [Nan Mulford Gallery]

Categories: ,

Bittersweet Bundles of Misery: Nick Hornby’s “A Long Way Down”

Here’s my review of Nick Hornby’s new book in today’s Newsday. I interviewed Hornby when About a Boy came out, for my first author profile ever, in fact. He was so patient with my tape-recorder fumblings (and, ahem, a mix-tape song list I brought to show him) that it was especially irksome to hear Terry Gross needling him about gruesomely irrelevant points the other day on Fresh Air. In any case, the bravery of the book speaks for itself.

Newsday logo

High Anxiety

A LONG WAY DOWN, by Nick Hornby. Riverhead, 333 pp., $24.95.

“People don’t jump from buildings anymore,” declares a stylish woman in “7 Stories,” a 1990 play by the comically deadpan Morris Panych. “Why not?” asks the unnamed hero who is, in fact, standing on a ledge. “The trend is much lighter,” she says. “More whimsical.” Everyone has theories about suicide, but in this unexistential though self-absorbed time it’s not a favorite cocktail-party subject. In “A Long Way Down,” the never merely funny Nick Hornby makes it into one, and the cocktail party happens on the ledge itself.

The four mourners-revelers in “A Long Way Down” are spending New Year’s Eve at a popular suicide spot. Separately, they’ve all climbed to the roof of the ghoulish London landmark Toppers’ House and intend to come down the hard way, but instead, they end up—as Maureen, a self-conscious older woman, phrases it—”nattering.” To her, talking is just a way to fill the hours, except during confession at the church that’s her sole community; her extremely disabled son, Matty, can’t speak.

In contrast, the other three value speech as a means to an end—that of self-expression and enlightenment or, at least, exhibitionism. Thus, although they can’t stop bickering to save their lives, they talk nonstop. Jess is a wild 18-year-old girl with a haunted family and the social graces of the Tasmanian Devil. JJ is American, a youngish rock guitarist dashed by the breakup of both his band and his idea of himself as a hybrid of Nick Drake and Pauline Kael. Martin is nationally notorious, a preachy TV host just out of jail for sleeping with a buxom minor—career suicide, in other words. Like the others, Martin thinks he knows all the angles, and that’s why he’s dangling his feet over the edge of the 15-story Toppers’ House.

Or is it? What Hornby does so brilliantly here—using each lost soul as a prism to magnify the others—is to make us see that there may be other reasons the four have ended up on the rooftop as, in Martin’s phrase, “the Kings and Queens of Shambles.” The themes of Hornby’s other work—love, obsession, popular music, child-rearing, success, loneliness, how to be good (as his last book’s title put it)—are cranked up to 11 here. The answer’s far from simple.

Despite our thirst for brashly green novelists, there’s a reason we turn back to seasoned writers. These writers, like Hornby, have lived longer, in both creative and concrete terms; it’s very much worth noting that Hornby has a severely autistic son, Danny. Illness of all kinds is a major motif here, and it’s not the first time Hornby has examined suicidal behavior specifically; Fiona in “About a Boy” actually tries it.

Hornby structures “A Long Way Down” as a kind of “Behind the Music,” with people taking turns dishing to an unspecified listener some time in the future. Some of these monologues are novelistically descriptive, others reflective, but all contain the affectations, slips, tics and curses—especially curses—of each character’s speech. The result recalls the rhythmic rise and fall of Nicholson Baker’s “Vox.” By the end of this dramatic, sad and thoroughly side-splitting novel, there are odd chimes going on in unlikely pairs. The grating girl and the pompous old fool, who can’t stand each other, are suddenly thinking along the same lines. The sad Catholic and the Cobain-ophile start agreeing on a plan.

There are arguments, which the four are happy to detail in their meanest spats, for all of these people’s untimely deaths, but there’s also a wealth of arguments against. Out of all this mirthless mirth comes—wondrously—actual wisdom about not just how to be good but how to live, if not well, at least better than badly.

Only very occasionally does all this not work like a charm. The lower-class Maureen is, even given her isolation, almost unbelievably unaware of basic facts of modern life. As she starts opening up to the implied listener like a cleared storm drain, she becomes increasingly sympathetic—but it seems unfair that it should take so long for her true nature to reveal itself when even the most disgraceful of the other characters get to be canny and expressive as they tell their stories. And although, as others will eventually do, we may come to feel parental toward Jess against our will, she’s awfully hard to take; the men are the educated wits.

And yet even this statement contains its own opposite. Maureen and Jess are lovely characters, full of heart and thought, and we cherish them by the end of the book. Although there’s no Hugh Grant part in the (forthcoming) movie, this time that’s a relief. No one in “A Long Way Down” gets off easily, and no one escapes our uneasy, fierce protectiveness.

About a Writer [6/19 profile of Hornby by Jeff Baker, Oregonian]

Categories: ,

Forsooth: Sally

I really like Kurt Andersen’s story on the new Doonesbury book in today’s Times Book Review. I too have a clear memory of Garry Trudeau’s intro to John Kerry (“You’re really clicking tonight, you gorgeous preppy”) from my mother’s copy of the book, which came out the year I was born (1971) but which became a useful meta-history text anyway. Since there was no Vietnam unit till college and I was as un-prone to watching foxhole footage as a girl child can be, good thing I had the complete set of Doonesbury volumes to teach me about hand grenades, Phred, radio journalism, university presidents, Nixon in China, weed, quarterbacks, Gay Talese, and portable typewriters. Anyway, I think Andersen’s off about just one little thing:

Another significant difference between ”Doonesbury” and all the other ”political” strips, from ”Pogo” to ”Shoe” to ”Mallard Fillmore,” is that Trudeau’s characters are not talking animals but human beings. The stakes and daily writerly challenge seem inherently greater. For their first 15 years of existence, the characters in ”Doonesbury” were like the Simpsons (and nearly every other comic-strip character in history except those in ”Gasoline Alley”): they were ageless. When Trudeau entered middle age himself, he started letting his creations grow older—and then promptly took an almost two-year hiatus. That could have turned into his shark-jumping moment, when the familiar rules of his fictional universe were overturned in a reckless bid for new juice. But instead of jumping the shark, which is born of boredom or creative bankruptcy, Trudeau actually raised his stakes some more. His characters graduated from college, got married, had children (who became characters themselves), got divorced, died. The strip became more ambitious, not less.

Leaving aside for a moment the possibility that “jumping the shark” may now be jumping the shark itself, how about “Sally Forth”? Don’t those characters age? I haven’t read the funny pages for a while, since I prefer my newspapers in crazy-salad form here on the information superhighway, but I have a distinct memory of that teenager as a baby. In any case, who knew the guy who writes “SF” had a witty, nicely designed blog? Well, he (Francesco Marciuliano) does, and it’s called Drink at Work. Carol Hartsell contributes good stuff as well. (Greg Howard was the original creator of the strip; Craig Macintosh draws the strip now.) Read some letters by Sally-haters, and either chortle or weep, depending. And call me ill-travelled, but the site has one of the coolest link-arranging concepts I’ve ever seen. Marciuliano also writes sharp political commentary on, for example, a bad cartoonist’s Terri Schiavo strips, and I don’t know why it should amaze me that he takes strong stands; it’s not as though his comic is supposed to be unbiased. Cue Intrepid Sketcher: The Garry Trudeau Story again. My God, that man ages well!

Stop the presses—I was thinking of For Better or For Worse, which I read every day in high school in the Chicago Tribune along with the honorable Dave Barry. Not only do the characters age, they have specific birthdates, years and all. Here’s the family tree. While “For Better…” isn’t exactly “Pogo” (nothing is), it’s still a popular strip. And now you have Drink at Work to add to your bookmarks. No, you don’t get to have a drink at work, because it’s the weekend, remember?

Bedtime for Benchleys

Getting tips from an important source
Even conservatives like Robert Benchley—very sensible of them, too. Case in point: S.T. Karnick (why do so many right-wingers use their initials?) in National Review Online, a hearty appreciation:

Benchley was in many ways the dean of American humorists until his death in 1945 at the height of his fame. Perelman was often funnier, Parker was sharper, White more respected as a thinker, and Thurber more widely loved, but Benchley was the most consistently delightful. Where Benchley was perhaps most notable was in the unfailingly cheerful nature of his writing. As confusing and silly as modern American life could be, Benchley never became bitter or despaired—at least not in his writing.

In his frequently assumed persona of scientific investigator, Benchley was the clear model for later humorist Dave Barry’s style of writing, in which the author comically tries (and fails) to explain how various things work in the baffling contemporary world. Christopher Buckley’s puckish view of the absurdities of America’s elites is another clear descendant of Benchley’s work. To this day, Benchley remains a model of concise, literate, intelligent, humor writing.

Good links, too. And hold onto your bowler hats: As Karnick reports, Love Conquers All, Benchley’s 1922 collection of humor pieces, is online. Read it all, from “The Benchley-Whittier Correspondence” to “Do Insects Think?” to “Polyp With a Past” to “Those Dangerously Dynamic British Girls.” Then rent A Night at the Opera. If you’re still in the dark, read more about Benchley on Nat Benchley’s homepage. Your day will then have been exceedingly well spent.

Categories:

Mouly, mountains, & a plethora of covers

One hundred and thirty original New Yorker covers! I saw the travelling exhibit of cover prints in Seattle, and it’s a beaut. I trust the folks at the Norman Rockwell Museum, where the collection of originals is on display till October 31, will know a bit more about the magazine than the gallery owners I spoke to out there, who were very friendly but didn’t know many details about individual artists or changes in cover art through the years. Everyone was having a great time talking about their memories of the covers there and others they remembered, though, and it was clearly a successful exhibit. They even gave out some fun promo stuff, left over from the party I just missed by having taken the special “turtle with a concussion” route from LaGuardia to the West Coast. Airdaze notwithstanding, I dug the Lufthansa puzzle.

A mint on the pillow

As for the new show, here’s Daniel Oppenheimer in the Mass. Valley Advocate:

Historians, I predict, will look back at the history of America in the 20th century and write that The New Yorker magazine influenced our culture in two significant ways. The first influence was on the creation of attitudes and styles for perhaps the world’s first mass upper-middle class.

The other influence—which is really a tributary of the first—was on the popularization of avant-garde art styles. All the many isms of 20th century modern and postmodern art have made their way into The New Yorker maw, where they’ve been filtered through the magazine’s epic bemused-ness and emerged on the other side, on the covers and in the comics. Once there they’ve eased their way, like a bemused mint julep, into the gullets and aesthetical sensibilities of millions of people who aren’t quite ready to be at the crest but enjoy being in the hearty middle of the next new wave in art.

Or not. I could be wrong. Make up your own mind at the Norman Rockwell Museum’s new exhibition, The Art of The New Yorker: Eighty Years in the Vanguard (the second half of the title would seem to cut against my claim that the New Yorker was a popularizer). And hash it out in the accompanying series of discussions with New Yorker artists and writers.

Tomorrow Françoise Mouly and Peter De Sève (of iPod Man fame) are speaking at the museum from 11 a.m. to 1 p.m. at a special media preview luncheon. It’s a great museum; if you live in the Berkshires (you lucky retriever) and there are any seats left, go there for me, would you? And Stockbridge is a gorgeous weekend spot. Hike a spell and have lunch at the Red Lion Inn, which I first visited when I was 11. I checked a few summers ago—it’s still good.

Categories: ,

Gladwell, Lethem, Wilsey, and other furry friends

And now, tonight’s incredible headliner….Johnny Lethem and the Go-Betweens!

On “Lavender,” [Robert] Forster also rhymes “well-read” with “good in bed” to describe the same woman. The group’s audience tends to fit at least one of the above categories; novelist Jonathan Lethem, for example, deems the Go-Betweens his favorite band. “I must admit that we were on the bus going through Europe the other day, and I looked around and saw the four of us, all with our heads in books,” McLennan says, adding, “I guess that’s better than having porn on.” What has he been reading? “A lot of contemporary Australian fiction. I’m also thoroughly enjoying a collection of Anthony Lane’s writing about film for the New Yorker. It’s a good tour read, because War and Peace can be tough going after a couple of vodkas—or maybe not.”

That was Johnny Ray Huston in the SF Bay Guardian. From the other, British Guardian, via Kottke: Malcolm Gladwell’s workspace, which will no doubt remind you of this week’s David Sipress cartoon set in a caffeinated hotspot. The cheery Korenish guy says to Mr. Laptop, “I’m sorry to bother you, but I was wondering if I could borrow a little work?”

In New York magazine, Francine du Plessix Gray and Sean Wilsey tell Boris Kachka all about their parent-paring memoirs.

And now, you might well ask, nay, have already asked, how is the début fiction? I’m reading it, in between bouts of radio loyalty, so rest assured you’ll know what I think as soon as I do.

Categories: , , , , , ,

Been Down So Long It Looks Like Up to Me

I’m supporting NPR this week by having it on a lot. So yesterday Terry Gross interviewed Nick Hornby about A Long Way Down, his new novel of dark-comedic suicidal contemplation, which I’m reviewing in this Sunday’s Newsday. I happen to have just started reading Curtis White’s The Middle Mind: Why Americans Don’t Think for Themselves, which includes the lambasting of Gross’ show that was that bombastic Harper’s Reading a few years ago. White writes: “Terry Gross’s interest in books and writers is too often morbid, perverse and voyeuristic.” I don’t listen to Fresh Air very often since it’s not at a convenient time, so I hadn’t felt the force of his critique—in fact, suspected it was overblown—till yesterday, when she proved him right in almost every moment of her excruciatingly unpleasant interview. Pointlessly sadistic? Prurient? Unrelenting? Check, check, check. Say, Nick, did you ever have someone close to you kill himself? Uh-huh, so how did he do it? Gas, huh? Hmm; were you surprised?

Were you surprised? No, Terry, we were all relieved actually. One less thing to worry about. She also managed to discuss Hornby’s autistic son—a character in A Long Way Down has a severely disabled child, though not autistic—in the most tasteless possible way, and I’m surprised Hornby didn’t throw something at her. She pursued the following question with gruesome zeal: You know how your character Maureen, the middle-aged Catholic woman who’s the mother of the disabled son, puts up posters that she’s only guessing her son might have liked if he could? Well, do you do that? Like dress your son in music or movie t-shirts that maybe he wouldn’t really like? Hornby was aghast but answered her questions in increasingly staccato and downbeat tones. Gross didn’t seem to notice but kept sniffing, hunting, sniffing. Down, Cujo!

Indeed, Hornby was a trouper, and got through the interview politely and even cheerfully, if you discounted the trapped and miserable edge to his voice each time she did this. Gross also insisted on discussing this nuance of fiction technique: Which suicide method hurts the most, and since jumping off a building (“not that I’ve ever experienced this!”—yes, that explains why you’re live on the radio right now) hurts the most, probably, why would you have your characters consider killing themselves that way? “Well,” Hornby said (paraphrasing), “it wouldn’t be as dramatic if they were all sitting separately in their cars. I had to get them to meet somehow, so I put them all on this rooftop so they could have a conversation.” Here’s White:

[T]here was a program in which Terry interviewed an author who had written a novel in which a woman says, “Drop dead,” to her husband and the next day he does drop dead. Before the novel was published, the author’s own real-life husband dropped dead on a tennis court. This was the point at which the book became interesting for Terry. If her poor husband hadn’t dropped dead, Terry would never have been interested in her or her book for this Show of Shows. “What did it feel like to suspect you’d killed your own husband with your art?” Fresh Air? How about Lurid Speculations? It’s like Dr. Laura for people with bachelor degrees. Car Talk has more intellectual content.

Hence, this examination in the tradition of Dwight Macdonald: Which of the characters, asked Gross, is actually Hornby in disguise, and how so, and then why ever did he put in a character that doesn’t share his background and personality? (Meaning Maureen.) You’d think, in Gross’ capacity as regular interviewer of fiction writers, she’d have read enough fiction by now to guess that maybe he made some of it up. Like a cheap TV prosecutor, she really, really wanted Hornby to admit that the failed rock guitarist, J.J., was modeled on himself. But all her questons were both wheedling and insinuating: We both know I know the answer. I’m just giving you a chance to say it first.

Call me middle-minded—and I’d say it’d be narrow-minded to do so on the basis of a radio station—but I like NPR a whole lot. (Witness the last few posts about excellent shows.) But after reading White’s Harper’s screed, which is a few years old now, wouldn’t Terry Gross have responded by toning down the more irrelevant (and, more to the point, dull) prying and concentrating on her subjects’ work? I don’t think she’s stupid; she just can’t seem to let go of this very poor interview technique. Oh well. Read A Long Way Down anyway. It’s a damn good novel.

The Middle Mind [Original piece; Context]

Categories: ,

Like a Roaming Vowel

Rolling Stone ace Anthony DeCurtis was just on NPR’s Soundcheck, talking to John Schaefer about meeting (two of) the Beatles, the bad moods of Van Morrison, and his new collection of (mostly) music profiles, In Other Words: Artists Talk About Life and Work. Both interviewers had a great time agreeing about the hazards and happy accidents of interviewing, and it was quite charming. Anyway, DeCurtis kept pronouncing the name of his magazine Rollingstone, not Rolling Stone, as I’m accustomed to, and as in “How does it feel/How does it feel/To be on your own/With no direction home/Like a complete unknown/Like a rolling stooone?” Is that the house pronunciation, or what? It now connotes roll ’em, role playing, role model, rather than, you know, stoned. Then again, rolling papers. I guess the gist is still pretty much intact.

Categories: ,