With apologies to Oprah, some Vermont alternatives to Faulkner, in the Rutland Herald. Look for New Yorkerists Galway Kinnnell, Ruth Stone, Bill McKibben, and Janisse Ray, among others.
Categories: Extracurriculars, Kinnell
With apologies to Oprah, some Vermont alternatives to Faulkner, in the Rutland Herald. Look for New Yorkerists Galway Kinnnell, Ruth Stone, Bill McKibben, and Janisse Ray, among others.
Categories: Extracurriculars, Kinnell
Oh, this nostalgic fiction of “summer reading”! But hey, it sells books. From St. Petersburg Times business columnist Robert Trigaux’s survey of 15 Tampa Bay-area businesspeople on their beach-reading agendas:
A few books of particular insight, including one about the virtues of the snap judgment and instinctive hunch, appeared on multiple lists this summer. Malcolm Gladwell’s bestseller, Blink: The Power of Thinking Without Thinking, wins praise from AmSouth’s Florida banking executive Susan Martinez, St. Petersburg/Clearwater Area Convention & Visitors Bureau chief Carole Ketterhagen and Peter Rummell, CEO of St. Joe Co. (Florida’s biggest private land owner).
“EVERYONE who deals with people should HAVE to read it,” Rummell wrote (the capitalized words are his) in an e-mail.
Others mentioned books with similar themes. Deanne Roberts of Roberts Communications in Tampa, just back from a tour of Eastern Europe, is reading James Surowiecki’s long-titled The Wisdom of Crowds: Why the Many Are Smarter Than the Few and How Collective Wisdom Shapes Business, Economies, Societies and Nations. The book makes a counterintuitive argument that the wisdom of the masses “under the right circumstances” is often smarter than the smartest person in the crowd.
I love how much editorializing (“the capitalized words are his,” “long-titled”) Trigaux gets into this short passage; it can be a life saver in a thanklessly list-y piece like this. A roundup like this is actually a pretty good indicator of the attention span of American capital:
This time, Dan Brown’s super-selling The Da Vinci Code is still on a few lists but is no longer the dominating read it was in past years. And books about Middle East history, religion and terrorism—big topics on summer lists after 9/11—are less prominent but can be found.
…
One favorite (and I must agree) is Thomas Friedman’s The World Is Flat: A Brief History of the 21st Century, the New York Times columnist’s look at how globalization and technology have enabled anyone with drive and talent to compete with anyone else, anywhere. In the United States, that message is only now starting to sink in…. From the big picture to the highly focused, books on Six Sigma are also popular…. History also remains a hot topic.
Call me preoccupied (I am, happily), but Trigaux’s lede sounds a bit like the gossip columns Sean Wilsey quotes with such glee in Oh the Glory: “Other than her ability to run a Coca-Cola Enterprises call center in Tampa and her fondness for a swift Porsche, I knew little about Nita Pennardt.” Or it’s a Danielle Steel noir. Fiction students: Go make your millions!
Reading Lists of Business Elites [St. Petersburg Times]
Categories: Gladwell, Surowiecki, Extracurriculars
How could I not have made the connection before? Parental memoir Oh the Glory of It All, which I don’t want to ever end; and parental memoir “I Bought a Bed,” Donald Antrim’s shockingly lovely 2003 New Yorker essay about life with and without his manically inventive mother. In fact, Antrim’s piece inspired this blog: What do you do when the issue date is long past but the issue is still smoldering? Who do you tell about the review that keeps coming back to you, or the strange melancholy of “Missing a Piece of Your Pattern?”?
But back to the memoirs—both are funny-sad, and both Antrim and Wilsey write with bemusement, clarity, sternly regulated moments of bitterness, and a perfect grasp of the absurd uncontrollability of their circumstances. I think exciting things are happening in nonfiction, and no one would dare call the essay a lost form anymore. Oh the glory of it all!
Tom Engelhardt and Mark Danner detail the outrages behind and resulting from the Downing Street memos. Danner’s response here to Knight Ridder’s John Walcott also appears in the July 14 New York Review of Books, and Tom Engelhardt’s piece appears on his blog. Here’s Engelhardt:
Let’s just add that if Post editorialists and Times journalists can’t tell the difference between scattered, generally anonymously sourced, pre-war reports that told us of early Bush administration preparations for war and actual documents on the same subject emerging from the highest reaches of the British government, from the highest intelligence figure in that government who had just met with some of the highest figures in the U.S. government, and was immediately reporting back to what, in essence, was a “war cabinet”—well, what can you say?
Danner writes (link is from source):
The Knight Ridder pieces bring up a larger issue. It is a source of some irony that one of the obstacles to gaining recognition for the Downing Street memo in the American press has been the largely unspoken notion among reporters and editors that the story the memo tells is “nothing new.” I say irony because we see in this an odd and familiar narrative from our current world of “frozen scandal”—so-called scandals, that is, in which we have revelation but not a true investigation or punishment: scandals we are forced to live with. A story is told the first time but hardly acknowledged (as with the Knight Ridder piece), largely because the broader story the government is telling drowns it out. When the story is later confirmed by official documents, in this case the Downing Street memorandum, the documents are largely dismissed because they contain “nothing new.”
Part of this comes down to the question of what, in our current political and journalistic world, constitutes a “fact.”… There’s lots more.
Speaking of NYRB, and of widespread (in this case unfounded) panic, did you know about the publishing arm’s reissue of Edward Gorey‘s version of The War of the Worlds? I didn’t, and it looks fantastic! They write:
In 1960, Edward Gorey prepared a set of his inimitable pen-and-ink drawings to illustrate a new edition of [H.G.] Wells’s The War of the Worlds for the legendary Looking Glass Library. Characteristically quirky, elegant, and entrancing, Gorey’s visual take on Wells’s seminal tour de force has been unavailable for close to fifty years. This special hardcover edition from NYRB Classics brings back for today’s readers a richly rewarding collaboration between two modern masters of all that’s wonderful and strange.
When I’m able to post PDFs, I’ll put up my interview with Gorey from just before he died. He collected rusted metal objects and had a tangly garden, and he wore the heaviest rings I’ve ever seen on a real person. When one slipped off and hit the floor, I’m pretty sure it made a dent. He talked long after the tapes ran out (about, for instance, Kenneth Koch and Joyce Carol Oates—those were separate anecdotes), and boy, is he missed.
How We Went to War: What the Downing Street Memos Demonstrate [via History News Network]
What the ‘Downing Street’ Memos Show [Christian Science Monitor]
Categories: Danner, Gorey, Extracurriculars
I’ve been meaning to post this all week. Why the Baltimore Sun jumped on the caption-contest story and our local Newsday only just reprinted it is like a unicorn in the garden—mysterious, but not unwelcome. There’s an ostensible hook in local runner-up Paul Zinder, but it’s really just an excuse to write about the magazine, which…I understand. The piece is jauntily written by Rob Hiaasen. As you know, I don’t normally post entire articles, but this one is so nicely reported I think it should be read as a whole. Note the standing Mankoff offer of a ten-spot if you find a cartoon that didn’t make it into the grand anthology; he’s been saying this since the book came out. Readers, your mission, if you choose to accept it.
So, two dinosaurs are merrily munching citizens of some metropolis. Gobbling people like microwave popcorn, and one dinosaur says to the other…
Well, what does it say?
So, there’s a business meeting being held in a New York City subway car and the one CEO says to the others…
OK, this is hard. One more.
A woman meets a man on the street. He’s carrying a briefcase. He’s shaped like the number 6. Smiling, he says to her…
Maybe it’s not so easy writing witty captions to New Yorker cartoons. The heavy humor lifting had been left to the staff for much of the magazine’s 80-year history. But now, with history recorded by anyone with a blog and music broadcast by any contestant on a reality TV show, people expect anyone can write a funny line or two under a silly cartoon.
“We live in a more democratic entertainment age,” says the magazine’s cartoon editor, Robert Mankoff. Why can’t someone be a caption writer? “Everybody thinks they are a newspaperman, too.”
Capitalizing on its popular franchise, The New Yorker has expanded its annual “Cartoon Caption Contest”, which began in 1998, to a weekly back-page feature. Readers used to have just one shot a year at greatness; greatness, as defined in this literary circle, is receiving a signed print of the cartoon and getting your name in the magazine.
Now, The New Yorker publishes a weekly cartoon caption for consideration, for which readers submit suggested captions. The staff picks three finalists from the submissions, prints them and, in a feature befitting American Idol, readers vote online for their favorite caption. The winner is then printed in a subsequent issue. It’s become quite a production. Now that the contest is under way, every week features three cartoons in various stages of being captioned.
More than 50,000 people have entered captions since April—or between 7,000 and 12,000 each week. “Not only do a significant number of people think they are funny—they actually are funny,” says Mankoff.
Paul Zinder thought he was funny. He probably is.
Zinder, a 34-year-old film professor from Westminster, came close to greatness last month. Call him the Bo Bice of the “Cartoon Caption Contest” in the magazine’s May 30 issue. The cartoon was those two dinosaurs scarfing down a tasty populace. Zinder, who spent all of two minutes staring at the cartoon, wrote: “Pass me a beer truck.” It was good enough to make him a finalist and he didn’t even have to sing “Sweet Home Alabama.”
But the winning caption was submitted by David Markham, a dentist in North Carolina. A funny dentist! Who knew? His entry: “Remember that time you made me laugh and people came out of my nose?”
“I think it’s very witty. My friends and I actually predicted it would win. It was more New Yorker-like than mine,” says Zinder, who is spending the year in Italy teaching film at the American University of Rome. He reads his favorite magazine online and plans to enter more caption contests. He has a taste for it now.
“I’ve been a finalist once,” Zinder says. “I’m not going to give up.”
To his credit, “Pass me a beer truck” avoided the common traps the nonprofessional caption writer falls into, Mankoff says. First, Zinder kept it short. And he didn’t try to combine elements or overthink the cartoon.
His entry also fell neatly into one of the magazine’s “humor constituencies.” In weeding through entries, the staff files them by category—such as clever, poignant and aggressive. Zinder’s caption was clever. The winning entry, on the other hand, was poignant. Who doesn’t look back fondly on the days when a friend made you laugh and milk came out of your nose?
Because reading 12,000 captions a week would render them all tragically unfunny, Mankoff relies on these humor constituencies and classifications. He also really needs his computer. He has programmed it to sort entries by “comic domains”—such as “most commonly used phrases.” Contrary to our right-brained egos, humans often respond to cartoons in similar ways.
The magazine recently asked readers to write a caption to a cartoon showing two people in bed with the Earth—not the moon—appearing in the night sky. Hundreds of readers responded with some variation of “So, the earth really did move.” Readers also tend to be in sync with the cartoonists, who have already written their own.
“The interesting thing is that in every single instance, the real caption is one of the captions people thought of,” Mankoff says, with maybe just a word or two changed.
In the May 9 issue, “First, you must gain their trust” was a finalist for a cartoon depicting a lab researcher wearing a mouse suit while taking notes on a group of caged mice. Cartoonist Mike Twohy’s caption was “First, you must earn their trust.” Close enough.
Voters, however, chose “More important, however, is what I learned about myself” as the winning caption. It wasn’t the staff’s pick, and the thought had crossed one creative mind to override the online tallies.
“These are just numbers here. Who’s going to know?” Mankoff jokes. “We decided to be completely ethical.”
The New Yorker is full-throttle in this cartoon business, with cartoon T-shirts, coasters, calendars and themed cartoon books (lawyers, dogs, politicians and, of course, drinking cartoons). Mankoff, a longtime cartoonist himself, assembled the magazine’s first “bank” of cartoon inventory. Last year, The Complete Cartoons of The New Yorker was published—all 68,647 of them. “Still, I’m haunted by the possibility that we missed one,” wrote Mankoff, the book’s editor. “So there’s ten bucks for anyone who can find any cartoon that we missed.”
The bet remains unclaimed.
Readers of The New Yorker are characteristically a literary and durable bunch. It requires endurance to tackle the magazine’s long fiction and investigative journalism. This isn’t to suggest John Updike, Susan Orlean or Seymour Hersh should slash their word counts. It’s just the longer pieces are one reason New Yorkers tend to pile up; most people haven’t accrued enough vacation time to finish some issues.
Given the magazine’s imposing depth, it’s no wonder many readers first flip to the cartoons. They want their dessert before the meal. And given this “democratic entertainment age,” no wonder thousands of people each week think they can write the best caption to
cartoons that puzzle and even paralyze lesser readers.So, we now know what the businessman said to the others in the New York City subway car during their meeting. “This is my stop. Phil, you’ll be C.E.O. till Sixty-third Street,” wrote the winning writer, Lewis Gatlin—again of North Carolina.
But what did the man shaped as the number 6 say to the woman? The finalists have been chosen, and the magazine will announce the winner in its July 4 issue. But we vote today for the entry by Robert Cafrelli of Pennsylvania:
“It’s me, ‘9’ from your yoga class.”
You know, I don’t think I’m a newspaperman, except in very private moments you’d probably rather not hear about, but that’s my only quibble. As for 9 from yoga class (devilishly good, and my favorite as well), they’re still counting the votes at press time. As for funny dentists, it would be a mistake to discount the vengeful Orin Scrivello, D.D.S. (Steve Martin) and the tuneful Dr. Joe Kitchell (Bernie West, from—once again—Bells Are Ringing), simply because they’re fictional.
One Day Their Prints May Come [Newsday, via Baltimore Sun; nice hed, anonymous former colleague!]
The festive Robert Benchley Society’s 2005 Summer Reading List is out: ten pithy pieces (by Benchley and others, including Mark Twain, P.G. Wodehouse, Jean Shepherd. Henry Alford, S. J. Perelman, etc.), and why to read them. The Benchley Society notes, “This year’s list includes some old favorites and some of the newer humor the kids enjoy these days—where you laugh at the thought of laughing.” Start your Amazon engines!
Categories: Benchley
All over fair Chicago, more toasts to The Clumsiest People in Europe, in the Chicago Tribune and the Sun-Times. Here’s Henry Kisor in the latter:
If you thought Evelyn Waugh and Paul Theroux were the most disagreeable travel writers ever, make room for Mrs. Favell Lee Mortimer, an Englishwoman who never left home. Between 1849 and 1854 she published three travel books of singular ill temper. The French, she wrote, “like being smart, but are not very clean.” Russians are “civil, but sly and dishonest, and fond of drinking.” The Irish subscribe to “the Roman Catholic religion. It is a kind of Christian religion, but a very bad kind.”
Nasty as her sentiments were, she delivered them engagingly, and Todd Pruzan has collected the most bizarre into The Clumsiest People in Europe, or: Mrs. Mortimer’s Bad-Tempered Guide to the Victorian World (Bloomsbury, $19.95).
Just the thing to help get through the long wait at airport security.
Judy Holliday on “What’s My Line?” (1958) [Judy Holliday Resource Center]
Categories: Pruzan
This week: Hendrik Hertzberg on the Supreme Court and medical marijuana (with a fabulous hed: “Watched Pot”); Rebecca Mead on Leonard Nimoy, photographer (I’ve seen some of these pictures!); David Remnick on Mike Tyson; Nick Paumgarten on Ry Cooder; Hanna Rosin, Jane Kramer, Alec Wilkinson (“The Crossing: Tackling the Pacific on a homemade raft”), J. M. Coetzee, Louis Menand, Hilton Als on “The Cherry Orchard” and “The Constant Wife”; Alex Ross on Philip Glass and scoring movies; Anthony Lane on “Bewitched,†“Me and You and Everyone We Know,†and “Yes”; a Seamus Heaney poem (hooray!), Eliza Griswold, and Robert Hass (“The Problem of Describing Treesâ€). Jim Surowiecki’s Financial Page (“Cops and Robbers”) also features Christoph Niemann‘s satisfying answer to the timeless question, “Who moved my cheese?”
In cartoonland, Liza Donnelly, Robert Mankoff, Alex Gregory, Carolita Johnson, C. Covert Darbyshire, Gahan Wilson, Jack Ziegler, Robert Weber, William Hamilton, Roz Chast, David Sipress, Drew Dernavich, Lee Lorenz, Bruce Eric Kaplan, Edward Koren, Mike Twohy, and Michael Crawford. (Here’s a feature from 2004 about Dernavich, Carolita Johnson, Matt Diffee, Eric Lewis, Alex Gregory, Marisa Acocella, and other members of the magazine’s younger-cartoonist generation.) Jacques de Loustal does les spots. Have any women done the whole-issue spots yet? Just curious. How about Maira Kalman? She’s good with small details. The cover, “Dog’s Eye View,” is by the magnificent Eric Drooker.
Jury’s still out on the début fiction, ’cause I’m still reading it. Aren’t you?
Cartoon fan, eh? You and these New Yorker artists are in the same boat. That is, you could be:
Cartoonist Sam Gross has mixed feelings about the cruise he’ll take in September.
On the one hand, he’s looking forward to the opportunity to discuss his craft with an interested audience. Gross is one of a half-dozen cartoonists for The New Yorker featured on three Celebrity line “cartoon cruises” offered this year.
“I do well interacting with people at bookstores and lectures and so forth,” says Gross. “I’m pretty fast on my feet.”
On the other hand, there’s the seasickness issue.
“On two occasions, I’ve contemplated suicide, and both of them were on boats,” he says with a sour laugh. “I’m not crazy about boats, I’ll tell you that.”
The cartoonist, who signs his work “S. Gross,” will share a seven-night cruise, beginning Sept. 24, with his colleague George Booth. New Yorker cartoonists Jack Ziegler and Victoria Roberts will be featured on a cruise beginning Sept. 17, with Danny Shanahan and Matthew Diffee on one that departs Oct. 1.
…
Gross, 71, began selling cartoon ideas to The New Yorker in 1964. Many of those early ideas actually were drawn by the legendary Charles Addams of The Addams Family fame.A few years later, the magazine began buying Gross’ cartoons, too.
One of his most famous efforts is a 1983 cartoon that shows a cow jumping over the moon. A bull, looking on, confides to a calf, “Your mother is a remarkable woman.”
…
At 62, cruising cartoonist Jack Ziegler isn’t much younger than Gross. Yet he represents a different generation of New Yorker artists.Gross’ sophisticated-gag approach and raffish style are a link to the magazine’s golden age. But Ziegler is one of a small handful of cartoonists (Roz Chast is another) who, in the 1970s, began pulling the publication into a more modern world.
To at least one person within the magazine, however, he was pulling too hard.
When Ziegler began selling cartoons to The New Yorker, they would never actually appear in the magazine. He mentioned that to the cartoon editor, who investigated the situation.
“It turns out that Carmine Peppe,” the man who laid out the magazine, “was shuffling them all to the bottom of the pile,” Ziegler recalls. “He felt that I was bringing down the standards of the magazine with this type of eccentric humor.” Keep rowing…
If I were choosing, I’d go with Victoria Roberts in September (the schedule and, mmm, pricing are here). Although Sam Gross is the genius behind the cartoon that even now sits in a small frame here at Emdashes Central: “I don’t care if she is a tape dispenser. I love her.”
Drawing a crowd: With `New Yorker’ cartoonists as part of the crew, Celebrity is hoping to lure the sophisticated set out to sea. [Jay Boyar, Orlando Sentinel]
On the SEASIDE—Cartoon-a-Day Desk Calendar for Cruisers [About.com]
Thankful for: Good Design! [The Rake’s Progress. “Carmine Peppe was the legendary layout editor at the New Yorker, one of its great unsung heroes. For more than fifty years, he was responsible for the incredibly delicate craft of space shimming, not unlike a master carpenter.”]