Monthly Archives: December 2005

Guilty pleasures: Gladwell, Kunkel, Sittenfeld &c. tell you what to read

From the Journal News, where you can read the whole list. Here’s their introduction and my highlights, all of which have a New Yorker connection of one kind or another. Not in original order; links and boldfacings (?) are mine.

It’s the time of year when a great book recommendation can make the difference between spending hours at the packed Barnes & Noble, or coming home with the perfect gift. So for the third straight year, we went for the best recommendations of all, and queried the authors of more than 50 of our favorite books of 2005, asking them to write about something they loved this year. The consensus pick is both a best seller and a National Book Award-winner, Joan Didion’s “The Year of Magical Thinking.” But there are plenty of surprises, as well. Nick Hornby picked a terrific thriller for the genre-fiction lover on your list. Curtis Sittenfeld, whose debut “Prep” was carried around by the hipster set this year like “The Catcher in the Rye,” offers up a memoir, also largely set in private schools, for the college-aged. Another buzzed-about first novelist, meanwhile, Ben Kunkel, urges readers to check out the latest story collection by an aging American master. And the recommendations don’t stop there—we have picks from writers of fantasy, Iraq memoirs, presidential biographies, cultural histories of race relations, chick-lit [note: Let’s ban this term for 2006, shall we?], American history, and much more. Let this be the year of no gift certificates.

Curtis Sittenfeld [“Prep”]
I absolutely loved Sean Wilsey’s memoir “Oh the Glory of It All” (Penguin). It’s about his parents’ rich messy San Francisco divorce, his horrible stepmother, his misadventures at multiple boarding schools, and his wonderfully bizarre world travels as part of a coalition of children promoting peace. Alternately hilarious and heartbreaking, it contains pretty much everything you could possibly want in a book.

Kaui Hart Hemmings, “House of Thieves” (Penguin)
My favorite book of 2005 was Sean Wilsey’s “Oh The Glory of it All” (Penguin). There were no reins on this thing and it absolutely soared. Money, sex, adolescence, familial cruelty, and skateboarding—he brilliantly shoved me into my favorite kind of territory. The entire book was a big shout to the people he loves so much despite it all. In a word: it ruled.

TC Boyle, “Tooth and Claw” (Viking)
I read and loved a whole truckload of things this year, including Annie Proulx’s “Bad Dirt,” Bob Dylan’s “Chronicles,” and Tom Wolfe’s “I Am Charlotte Simmons,” but the one that really put a scare and a thrill into me was Alan Burdick’s “Out of Eden: An Odyssey of Ecological Invasion” (FSG). The chapters about the brown tree snake’s invasion of Guam are unparalleled. I also had fun with Elizabeth Royte’s “Garbage Land” (Little, Brown) (where does all that stuff go?) and Mary Roach’s “Stiff” (WW Norton), which tells in vomit-inducing detail what becomes of our corporeal selves after death. It so shook me that I’ve decided not to die.

Bret Easton Ellis, “Lunar Park” (Knopf)
My favorite book of the year—no surprise—was Joan Didion’s “The Year of Magical Thinking” (Knopf). It’s her most accessible, direct and emotional writing and I read it in one sitting, shaking. On the other side: Dennis Cooper’s “The Sluts” (Carroll & Graf) was hugely satisfying and as addictive as anything he’s ever written. It’s not only a deeply compelling murder mystery but also a grand summation of all of Cooper’s great themes. Not for the faint-hearted, but genius. I also liked Jonathan Safran Foer’s 9/11 novel, “Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close” (Houghton Mifflin). He pulled off something incredibly difficult with a grace and ease that amazed and moved me.

Malcolm Gladwell [the universe]
I have a guilty pleasure. I love Lee Child, and “One Shot” (Delacorte) was probably my favorite book of the year. There is something about Jack Reacher—hard-boiled, taciturn, repressed, man-of-quiet-violence Jack Reacher—that is utterly irresistible to me. Does it matter that every Lee Child book is basically the same? Not at all. It’s like complaining that ordering the same thing on the menu twice in a row at Le Cirque is a problem.

Elizabeth Crane, “All This Heavenly Glory” (Little, Brown)
“Simplify” (University of Illinois Press) by Tod Goldberg is lovely and odd; “The Diviners” (Little, Brown) by Rick Moody is perfect; “Hairstyles of the Damned” (Akashic Books) by Joe Meno rocks; “Encyclopedia of an Ordinary Life” (Crown) by Amy Krouse Rosenthal is not ordinary at all; “The Brief and Frightening Reign of Phil” by George Saunders (Riverhead) is brief and hilarious and not at all frightening; and “Men and Cartoons” (Doubleday) by Jonathan Lethem features suicidal sheep. Why would you want more than that?

Myla Goldberg, “Wickett’s Remedy” (Doubleday)
Tim Kreider’s “Why Do They Kill Me?” (Fantagraphics) is a fearless collection of dark, irreverent, and seriously funny political cartoons that acts a welcome salve for anyone who didn’t vote for the man currently inhabiting the White House.

Nick Hornby, “A Long Way Down” (Riverhead)
One of the novels I’ve most enjoyed this year was Jess Walter’s “Citizen Vince” (HarperCollins), which is in part a thriller about voting—it’s 1980, and Vince is a petty crook who’s been placed in a witness protection program in Spokane. He is about to exercise his democratic right for the first time. Carter or Reagan? Vince hardly has the time to decide, because someone wants to kill him. This terrific book, a small-town “Mean Streets,” is smart, funny, dark and moving, and Walter is clearly a writer to watch.

Nicole Krauss, “The History of Love” (WW Norton)
“The Old Child & Other Stories” (New Directions) by Jenny Erpenbeck. Erpenbeck was born in East Berlin in 1967, and she arrives here translated flawlessly by Susan Bernofsky. The title novella, “The Old Child,” describes the stark economy and mystical landscape of a homeless girl’s interior life as she tries to survive in a children’s home where she’s been placed by the police. In this and Erpenbeck’s stories, the brutality of her subjects combined with the fierce intelligence and tenderness at work behind her restrained, unvarnished prose is overwhelming. I haven’t read anything this good—this bracing, unflinching, and alive—for a long time.

Ben Kunkel, “Indecision” (Random House)
I’m always grateful whenever there’s something new by James Salter. This year he published “Last Night” (Knopf), a story collection. I especially like Salter’s slightly curdled romanticism, and his style that’s so casual and lapidary at once. In his stories, he creates an effect of the tremendous offhandedness of fate.

Elizabeth McKensie, “Stop That Girl” (Random House)
Everything by Haruki Murakami fills me with awe and excitement and “Kafka on the Shore” (Knopf) was no exception. Maybe all the more so because he keeps getting better, even when that seems impossible. His stuff seems to spring from somewhere betwe
en the deepest mysteries of the collective unconscious and breakfast. I love him as a writer—and maybe as a man.

Rick Moody, “The Diviners” (Little, Brown)
A first novel I really loved recently was “Misfortune” (Little, Brown) by Wesley Stace. It’s a sort of a grand 19th-century yarn in which the narrator is first a boy and later a girl and then a boy again, and there are evil relatives who appropriate a castle that doesn’t belong to them, and there is much singing of ballads, etc. I read it with great excitement, astonished by its verve and sense of literary history, and this is all made even more impressive because the author is also a singer-songwriter of considerable note, who performs under the name John Wesley Harding. Apparently this is what he’s able to do on the side.

Scott Turow, “Ordinary Heroes” (FSG)
I loved Benjamin Kunkel’s “Indecision” (Random House) about a 28-year-old who truly needs to get a life. It is touching but very funny, even zany at moments, and is crafted with an original voice.

Meg Wolitzer, “The Position” (Scribner)
The book I loved this year was Kazuo Ishiguro’s “Never Let Me Go” (Knopf). I was less interested in its dystopianism than in its vision of repression and its consequences on people’s lives. Ishiguro does repression better than anyone; he did it so memorably with his butler narrator in “The Remains of the Day,” and he does it equally affectingly here, with his cloned narrator, Kath. (I’m obviously not one of those people who feels the need to write “spoiler alert!” before giving away information about a book’s plot.) What this heartbreaking and original book gives us is an approximation of human life. Ishiguro is a writer whose characters are sometimes afraid, and sometimes not fully alive, and so Ishiguro needs to be unafraid and alive for them. This is a little masterpiece.

When bloggers are former fact-checkers

They find things fast. Surely this is the clever winner of cartoon caption contest #29, a.k.a. “Republicans have cooties” (OK, maybe it’s just “Politicians have cooties”). Note interesting premonitions of his caption in bold:

T.C. Doyle [email] Senior Executive Editor

As Senior Executive Editor of VARBusiness, Doyle is responsible for mapping out the magazine’s news coverage, including breaking stories, cover features, software, networking, ASPs, ISPs, interviews and analysis.

An editor and columnist with the award-winning publication, Doyle returned to VARBusiness magazine in April 1999.

The author of several landmark studies on distribution trends, Doyle has covered the computer industry for more than a decade and has been a frequent speaker at industry events and trade shows…. The author of more than 1,000 technology news articles, columns, features and profiles, Doyle resides in Park City, Utah.

It’s not the first time a winner’s background has proven useful for his or her caption. (It’s also not the first time the great Gahan Wilson has contributed a drawing for the contest.) In any case, how does T.C. Doyle feel about winning the contest whose semifinalist results were published in the same issue as a short story by T.C. Boyle? Has this been a helpful connection or an irksome confusion? What would Boyle think of Doyle’s impish paisley projection? Why does Doyle think the politician in Wilson’s drawing is more Napoleon Dynamite than Jon Huntsman, Jr.? There’s only one way to find out.

Update: He’s out of town for a spell. We’ll catch up with him later.

Categories: , ,

Irish guys, gals smiling

From the Times o’ London report on the U.K.’s first gay “civil partnership”:

BELFAST scored a first yesterday — but delivered it with the unmistakable imprimatur of Northern Ireland — when a lesbian couple became the United Kingdom’s first participants in a civil partnership ceremony as the native Old Testament tendency howled its dismay.

Northern Ireland was first because the registration period is shorter. Henry Kane and Christopher Flanagan, who arrived at City Hall in a pink stretch limousine shortly after Ms Sickels and Ms Close departed, became the first male gay couple to form a civil partnership.

But Northern Ireland’s fundamentalist streak ensured that the “Save Ulster from Sodomy” brigade — mostly members of the Rev Ian Paisley’s Free Presbyterian Church — were outside singing hymns and hurling abuse such as “sodomy is a sin”, “you’re going to Hell” and “filth, filth, filth”.

Happily for the couple on their big day a counter-demonstration soon formed, with humour as its main weapon. Two satirical interlopers infiltrated the anti-gay ranks wearing garish sports jackets and toothbrush moustaches but no trousers, carrying their own placards as an antidote to the religious tracts being paraded in Donegall Square.

These read “Bring back slavery” and “Earth is flat”. There was so much laughter that even the moral indignation of the Christian fundamentalists seemed on the verge of giggles. At times it seemed that the excitement generated by the first occasion on which a same-sex couple could legally commit themselves to one another would descend into a punch-up. That it did not perhaps speaks volumes about how much this once dourly Presbyterian city, where playground swings used to be chained up on Sundays, has changed.

But among the guests Brenda Murphy and partner Nuala Quiery decided they were not going to be intimidated and they proudly joined friends and family through the front entrance. “You need to repent, love,” cried James Dowson, of the Christian Reform Foundation, who mistook Ms Murphy and her friend as the happy couple. “You are marrying this other lady, and that’s a sin.”

“You’d be so lucky to have this lady, mate,” she replied.

The kids are podcastic

If you’re even a low-lying fan of J.K. Rowling and you aren’t dowloading MuggleCast, giggle away, but do it. I’m only on my second episode—that would be episode 20—but my hope for the next generation of literary and film critics is assured. These kids (teenagers and a twentysomething or two) are ardent, insightful, polite—WNYC-guest interruptniks could learn a lot from them—articulate, culturally savvy, and hilarious. Which has more practical value, intellectual skill or loyalty? Is it character development or marketing when Emma Watson gets progressively more tarted up in each movie installment, and how does that affect Rowling’s young female fans, long inspired by the idea of Hermione as being above superficial matters like unfrizzy hair? In an institution in which factionalism has been encouraged, do warring subsets necessarily unite after a crisis? The discourse is miles above the level of your average kiddie fansite, and it’s very well produced (how is that possible? I bet they do it themselves). One of the hosts, 16-year-old homeschooler Laura, mentions at the end of the current podcast that she doesn’t own an iPod. She deserves one, and all of them deserve to be well rewarded for creating such an organized and entertaining outlet for the pure passionate excess of young fandom.

Archive glitchy?

Journalist John DeFore, writing about himself in the third person in the Austin American-Statesman, reports on the troubles he encountered while using The Complete New Yorker.

He loaded the program on his computer and began to browse through some of the most brilliant prose ever hawked at a newsstand. A few minutes later, he was having problems. An hour later, reality set in. Mr. DeFore decided to stop trying to sound like a “Talk of the Town” column and start doing what he does best: find fault.

He finds the search function especially trying. Still, he concludes,

The flubs above were assembled not over weeks of nitpicky research, but in three hours of casual browsing. That brief survey also revealed an array of annoying user-interface features (too many big and small ones to list here) of the sort you’d expect from bargain-bin software.

Still, I won’t be letting go of “The Complete New Yorker” any time soon, and I might have purchased a copy even after discovering these flaws. At $100 retail (and a whole lot less through some vendors), the set costs under two and a half cents per issue. Eight cents for each macabre Charles Addams cartoon. Less than a buck per Dorothy Parker entry, and under a quarter per Pauline Kael essay. The whole review.

An emdashes reader recently tipped me off to this series of Complete New Yorker posts at Hooptyrides—which features some fantastic screen grabs and excerpts—about one user’s DVD disgruntlements, some of which overlap with DeFore’s. It’s reassuring to know, after corresponding with New Yorker warrior archangel and Head of Library Jon Michaud, that the DVD archive staff is working on stuff like this more or less around the clock. The Oompa-Loompas, the Keebler elves, the coal-toting Susuwatari from Spirited Away, and even the mighty NYU adjuncts can hardly keep up with them.

Bud dear, can you spare a lime?

A belated but welcome review in the Charlotte Observer (and others) of Calvin Trillin’s New Yorker Festival multisnack walking tour:

The tour began at a vest-pocket park in the Village. Trillin, in short-sleeved shirt and a white ball cap from an Arkansas barbecue joint, donned a wireless microphone and drew a crowd of locals and distant fans.

“I think he’s just an American treasure,” said Nancy Timmerman of Mount Pleasant, Mich., who built a trip to the festival around the chance to hang with Bud, as he’s known to friends.

One friend on the tour, Beth Elon, lives on a farm in Italy and writes about food for Israeli newspapers.

“Bud is more of a glutton than anything else,” Elon said while turning the corner at Bleecker Street in Trillin’s West Village neighborhood.

“He loves tastes and weird combinations. It goes far beyond whatever is fashionable. He’s lusty about food.” Keep grazing.

Here’s a piece from ’02 by Sarah Lazarovic in the National Post (reprinted on Long Live Irony) about a previous Trillin tour, with good photos. Chowhound did it in ’04.

Drew and Adam, Pt. 3: Clip-on Parrots’ Revenge

When we last checked in with them early this morning, recent caption contest winner, snowboarder, and newly minted St. Lawrence University graduate Adam Szymkowicz (who at press time was still not a New York playwright) had replied to the pithy questions of New Yorker cartoonist Drew Dernavich. Now Dernavich gets his say. He’s in boldface, much like his boldly inked drawings (for example, in the cartoon now accompanied by Szymkowicz’s snappy caption).

[Adam Szymkowicz:] All right, my turn to ask questions:

So why parrots on businessmen’s shoulders, and what would you have had the parrot saying?

I think my original idea for the caption is best left to fade into the ether. It didn’t have anything to do with pirates or crackers, however. It’s safe to say that the clip-on idea took it in an unexpected direction.

Who is your favorite cartoonist, and in line with that, how did you decide you wanted to be a cartoonist?

As a youngin’, it was actually the political cartoonists in my local papers that first caught my attention—Jeff MacNelly, Doug Marlette, and the like. I loved their drawings. But of all the cartoons that I soon came to enjoy—”Shoe,” “Calvin & Hobbes,” “The Far Side,” “Zippy the Pinhead”—it was probably Matt Groening’s “Life in Hell” that most inspired me to start drawing cartoons myself. That strip showed me that you don’t have to be a master draftsman as long as you have a keen sense of humor. That’s what I like about the cartoonists in the magazine. There are some incredible artists who draw cartoons, but the art is, in many respects, irrelevant. They have sharp ideas, and that’s what counts.

On a deeper level, I was frustrated as an art student by what seemed to be a lack of criteria about what made a great work of art, and by the subjective and mercurial tastes of the art world. But with cartoons, you either “got it” or you didn’t, and I liked that. You could make an argument that that’s not necessarily true, but that was my experience.

What’s the most ridiculous thing you’ve ever engraved on a headstone?

What do you want engraved on yours?

I’ve engraved lots of things that, when you look at them, you wonder why somebody would choose to be remembered by them—lawnmowers, beer bottles, motorcycles riding off into the sunset with nobody operating them. But the weirdest thing was a grim reaper, and there was no funny caption to go along with it.

What do you prefer, boxers or briefs?

Are you asking because you are buying me a Christmas gift? I’m all set in the underwear department, but I could use a new turtleneck.

If you were given a shovel in a public place, by someone you didn’t know, what would your first instinct be?

To look around and try to find the hidden television camera.

You have ten words to describe yourself, they all must begin with the letter “T”…ready, get set, go!

Ten! That’s The Toughest Task To Try Today! Tomorrow, Too!

Finally, if you were given the choice, would you rather de-pants a bear (assuming bears wore pants) and immediately be mauled, or would you rather be mauled by a bear, knowing that in the future (after you healed) you would be able to de-pants it without injury? Why?

Is this the type of philosophical question that somehow went unanswered during your undergraduate days? I am appalled. My answer would be the same as Aristotle’s, which is on page CDXLVII of Metaphysics.

Good luck, keep up the awesome cartoons, and enjoy answering these questions.

Your friend and fan,
Adam Szymkowicz

Thanks Adam!

Final note: Here’s a cool little video of Dernavich drawing audience suggestions. Videographer Andy Carvin (from whom I stole the image above—thank you, Andy!) writes:

One aspiring cartoonist asked him some questions about the biz, but after that, Dernavich started taking requests. After drawing a picture of a man covered in grass cuttings from his neighbor’s lawn mower, Chewbacca-style, he made eye contact with me and paused to see if I had a drawing request. I drew a blank for a moment, but then asked him how he would portray Boston’s notorious problem with bad street signage. (If you want to get lost in Boston, follow the signs and it’s inevitable.) Dernavich smiled, paused another moment, and got to work, drawing a “Welcome to Massachusetts” sign almost completely obscured by a giant tree…

***

Other Emdashes caption-contest interviews:

  • Robert Gray, winner #106 (“Have you considered writing this story in the third monkey rather than the first monkey?”)
  • David Kempler, winner #100 (“Don’t tell Noah about the vasectomy.”)
  • David Wilkner, winner #99 (“I’d like to get your arrow count down.”)
  • Richard Hine, winner #98 (“When you’re finished here, Spencer, we’ll need you on the bridge-to-nowhere project.”)
  • Carl Gable, winner #40 (“Hmm. What rhymes with layoffs?”)
  • T.C. Boyle, winner #29 (“And in this section it appears that you have not only alienated voters but actually infected them, too.”)
  • Evan Butterfield, winner #15 (“Well, it’s a lovely gesture, but I still think we should start seeing other people.”)
  • Jan Richardson, winner #8 (“He’s the cutest little thing, and when you get tired of him you just flush him down the toilet.”)
  • Roy Futterman, winner #1 (“More important, however, is what I learned about myself.”)

Adam and Drew, Pt. 2: A Cartoon Caption Contest Interview

In which Cartoon Caption Contest champ Adam Szymkowicz answers the Derwent Drawing Pencil-sharp questions of master cartoonist (and professional carver of headstones) Drew Dernavich. Szymkowicz’s questions and Dernavich’s answers will follow in the next few days.

Adam:

Congratulations on winning The New Yorker‘s Cartoon Caption Contest. You’re now the proud owner of a unique collaborative piece of artwork, and you will of course need to protect it by buying the Extended Warranty from me. I’ll have my people contact your people. Until then, a few questions:

Have you ever been caught with a clip-on tie?

How long did it take you to come up with the caption?

If I had drawn the parrot speaking, what might it have been saying?

Who is your favorite cartoonist, New Yorker or otherwise (think carefully about this one, Adam…)?

Are you considering a career as a cartoonist, or is this a one-off for you?

I see that you’re involved with the visual arts. What other kind of art are you interested in? What kind of art inspires you?

As a fellow New Englander and a stone engraver, I have spent my share of time in Vermont. Tell me something that you find funny about Vermont.

Finally—what are your plans for the cartoon?

Congrats again and best wishes, Adam—

Drew Dernavich

Adam’s reply:

As far as I can see it, the clip-on tie is the most important safety device developed in the last thirty years. Did you know that since the introduction of the clip-on tie, accidental hanging-related deaths have dropped a remarkable 11% among regular tie wearers?

As for the caption, it was spawned out of the ether, in about twelve seconds. As long as it should feasibly take to envision a clip-on parrot.

If the parrot were to be speaking, the first thing I’d have to determine was whether the parrot was talking to another parrot, or to one of the businessmen. If the parrot were talking to another parrot I think he’d have to be saying “Well, where’d you get yours?” If it was speaking to the businessmen it would have to be saying “Awk! Don’t worry, it’s on the company card! Awk!” or something of that nature.

My favorite cartoonist is a toss-up between Bill Watterson and Gary Larson. I grew up on “Calvin and Hobbes” and “The Far Side”—I think it shows.

I’d love to be a cartoonist, except I can’t draw. I have the artistic talent of an Ikea coffee table. Maybe less. However, this does not mean that I can’t enjoy art. I really am driven by cartoons, from the old “Looney Tunes” and “Acme Hour” that I used to watch at my grandmother’s house. Something about the Coyote’s unattainable quest for the Roadrunner just gets me. I also have a deep love for all things literary, and am constantly inspired by the classics (Kerouac, Melville, Cheever, among billions of others), and by new writers that I hear about word-of-mouth or through some of the newer literary mags (McSweeney’s, Vestal Review, Black Warrior, etc.).

Something funny about Vermont…that’s tough. After you’ve lived somewhere long enough even the mundane becomes absurd. I’m not sure if this is all that funny, but it’s interesting to go walking through the fields near my house and see old foundations and ancient farming equipment. It really puts you in your place to see the land reclaiming that which was once used to cultivate it and bring it more into the sphere of man. Sorry, waxing mad philosophical. A slow place like Vermont gives you a lot of time for that sort of thing.

As for my plans for the cartoon…just you wait. It’s actually the first subtle step toward my eventual world takeover.

All right, my turn to ask questions:

So why parrots on businessmen’s shoulders, and what would you have had the parrot saying?

Who is your favorite cartoonist, and in line with that, how did you decide you wanted to be a cartoonist?

What’s the most ridiculous thing you’ve ever engraved on a headstone? What do you want engraved on yours?

What do you prefer, boxers or briefs?

If you were given a shovel in a public place, by someone you didn’t know, what would your first instinct be?

You have ten words to describe yourself, they all must begin with the letter “T”…ready, get set, go!

Finally, if you were given the choice, would you rather de-pants a bear (assuming bears wore pants) and immediately be mauled, or would you rather be mauled by a bear, knowing that in the future (after you healed) you would be able to de-pants it without injury? Why?

Good luck, keep up the awesome cartoons, and enjoy answering these questions.

Your friend and fan,

Adam Szymkowicz

P.S. Who are these “people” you’re talking about? Are there people watching me?! Are you in on it?!

Update: Dernavich replies.

***

Other Emdashes caption-contest interviews:

  • David Kempler, winner #100 (“Don’t tell Noah about the vasectomy.”)
  • David Wilkner, winner #99 (“I’d like to get your arrow count down.”)
  • Richard Hine, winner #98 (“When you’re finished here, Spencer, we’ll need you on the bridge-to-nowhere project.”)
  • Carl Gable, winner #40 (“Hmm. What rhymes with layoffs?”)
  • T.C. Boyle, winner #29 (“And in this section it appears that you have not only alienated voters but actually infected them, too.”)
  • Evan Butterfield, winner #15 (“Well, it’s a lovely gesture, but I still think we should start seeing other people.”)
  • Jan Richardson, winner #8 (“He’s the cutest little thing, and when you get tired of him you just flush him down the toilet.”)
  • Roy Futterman, winner #1 (“More important, however, is what I learned about myself.”)