Monthly Archives: December 2007

Benjamin Chambers on the “Best American” Essays, Pt. 1

Benjamin Chambers, of the splendid literary website The King’s English, has thus far proven to be the ideal reader of the Squib Report if not this entire blog. After I posted exhaustive lists of the Best American essays and short stories according to Houghton Mifflin (in which there are still gaps—by all means submit missing years if you have them!), he not only provided us with the data for two years in the essay list but also decided that he would read all of the listed essays. Benjamin: I admire your dedication! Judging from your industriousness, you’ll have no trouble finishing off the list.
Here is his first update on his reading progress. We look forward to the next installments!

The reading’s going well. Slowly, but well…. I was fascinated to learn the story behind Joe Bob Briggs (Trillin), enjoyed Berton Roueche’s “Marble Stories,” and Pfaff’s “Dimensions of Terror,” but nearly foundered on Anthony Bailey’s “Good Little Vessel.” (One of those “interminable” ones for which the NYer gets such a bad rap.) I had just completed Frances FitzGerald’s “Memoirs of the Reagan Era,” which was an interesting adjunct to Joan Didion’s collection, Political Fictions, when—as often happens with these NYer reading expeditions—I got sidetracked to something not on the list: FitzGerald’s two-parter on the Rajneeshee, who built one of the stranger latter-day communes here in Oregon, where I live. Of them all so far, the one I found most deeply compelling was Vicki Hearne’s essay on language, though I admit it’s sometimes a little hard to follow….

Thanks again for posting this list—it’s really inspired me to go back to the Complete NYer and make use of it. Of course it’s difficult to poke around in it for long without finding something of interest, but having a definite reading plan makes it seem more purposeful.

You’re welcome! Inspiring people to delve into the CNY is pretty much the only purpose of the Squib Report! Stay tuned for more reports from Benjamin. —Martin Schneider

Als Well That Blogs Well

If you hadn’t noticed, Hilton Als is now blogging at newyorker.com; the blog is cleverly called “Et Als.” (As the magazine adds more blogs, there will be many more naming opportunities, I’m jubilant to note. Our commenters came up with a few alternates for Hendrik Hertzberg’s blog title, I recall. One’s mind whirrs. “Splendor in the McGrath” … “A Drop of Mead” … “Angell in the Outfield” … “Penny Lane” … “Denby the Riverside” … “Lean and Orlean” … “In-Specter” … “Lead Singer” … “Auletta Man Have His Say” … “Go Pack Go” … “Master Bilger” … “Schamanism” … “Thurman Country” … “Surowieckipedia” … “Man’s Best Friend” [or “Menand’s Best Friend,” a collaboration] … “Chon Day & Gawande” [ditto, from beyond the grave] … “Collect McCall” … “YouToobin” … “Franklin, My Dear” … “Owen in the Wind” … “My, He’s Lahr” … “Focus Groopman” … “I Never Promised You a Paumgarten” … “Frazier” … well, you see how it goes, unfortunately.)

Als writes in his inaugural post:

Blogs are a matter of trust. The reader reads them hoping not just to pick up some form of retail inspiration—“This is the album I’m listening to; maybe you’d like to listen to it, too!”—but also to learn something about the landscape of the writer’s mind, his way of being.

He recently posted a tender reminiscence about Elizabeth Hardwick, and his latest entry is about Julian Schnabel’s film The Diving Bell and the Butterfly.

I like this blog very much, but I am dismayed to see that Als uses the term “females” in place of “women” in his Schnabel post. I know he’s being complimentary here, but I can’t read or hear “females” without thinking of the study of animals in the wild (“The males are docile, but the females will tear off your eyebrows if you’re not careful”), or possibly a grisly police report (“The disfigured bodies of two females were discovered in the alley following the Gordon Lightfoot concert”).

It’s a common online-dating term, certainly, but I would hope that anyone seeking love would avoid any profile in which a man claims to be seeking a “female” of any description. Don’t you find it a somewhat clinical term? Or am I alone in this?

Paulettes, Start Your Engines

No time to describe this now, just know it’s about Pauline Kael and her influence on contemporary—and contemporary New Yorker—film criticism, and also that the writer uses “kaelled” as a verb in his headline. (Which seems to be a gaming term when spelled with one L; if you know more, write in.) As for me, I own almost every single Kael volume in first edition, and I don’t collect first editions! And one of ’em’s signed! Don’t burgle me!
Speaking of film critics, Juno, Knocked Up, and suchlike, here’s a sound critique of complaints by Time‘s Richard Corliss, who thinks critics are showing off with their lists of arty obscurities and ignoring “mainstream” movies. What can American movie audiences handle? Why don’t we try making and hyper-promoting fewer terrible movies and find out?

LibraryThing! Thou Benign Expresser of Aspiration!

O December, time of year-end lists. I suppose it’s fashionable to bemoan the listiness of this season. I don’t partake in the derision. The lists fold so well into the resolutions of December 31; I’ve got to read this and this and this book; pick up that CD by that one group; get myself to see that one play before it closes! For anyone aspiring to cultural mavenhood (I aspire, at least), it’s a time of promise.
Relatedly, you know what I like? I like LibraryThing’s Bookshelf feature. You’re supposed to use it for books you’ve read, but LibraryThing has recently limited its nonpaying (i.e., freeloading) users to 100 titles, which puts a crimp in the whole “here’s what I’ve read” concept. So I’ve repurposed my list to display titles I would like to own but do not. Here’s mine, by all means, have a peek.
Reading aspirations are complicated. A list like this one is a great way to show off how erudite you are, or want to be; protestations that I would certainly end up reading the merest fraction of the listed titles (which I make, I make!) end up being ineffectual.
I prefer the Bookshelf to that blog perennal, the linked Amazon wishlist, which I often find a mildly aggravating passive-aggressive move. With the Bookshelf (when used as I have), the implied demand for reader gifting is put at several removes. So if, dear reader, you desperately want to buy me any of these books, hey, go nuts. But I’m not going to supply the link that turns it into a subtle expectation on my part.
I wish I could find an easy way to convert the list of titles into .txt format so I could pop it into my iPod. But I haven’t, yet. Whenever I’m in bookstores, I can never remember which darned books I so ardently desire.
The true secret reason I like LibraryThing’s Bookshelf is, Look! Pretty covers! —Martin Schneider

Live From the Site of Emdashes’ Conception

Yes, the honest, scrappy, and cozy/rockin’ (depending on the time of day) Williamsburg bar The Lucky Cat, which, three years ago almost to this day, was the site of my very first post here at Emdashes. Oh, the dough we haven’t made since then! But it’s been delightful, don’t get me wrong. Anyway, I’m posting not just out of nostalgia but to note that Heather Havrilesky at Salon has discovered and loves The Maria Bamford Show, as well as some other web shows you can read more about in her column. Here’s Jesse Thorn’s interview with Bamford for The Sound of Young America, where I first discovered her electric genius.

And Speaking of Cartoons, a Voice From the Past

…my past, that is: I’m not sure how I missed this, but recently for the Voice, the veteran (by which I don’t mean old, just savvy) arts and sports writer Brian Parks compiled a humor batting-average chart for the “fall season” of New Yorker cartooning and ranked them by “humor success percentage,” which soars as high as .556. I’d like to know more about his criteria; Brian, give us some insight into your rankings! Brian is not only a friend from that long-ago millennium of which I so rarely speak, but the author of two of the funniest plays known to modern American drama, Vomit & Roses and Wolverine Dream, known in tandem as Americana Absurdum. So the guy knows funny when he sees it, but my question is, where did he see it?

Cartoonists, Rejected! Accepted! Interviewed!

New Yorker cartoonists Matt Diffee and Carolita Johnson, respectively editor of and contributor to the latest Rejection Collection book, were on the radio this morning talking about the book and cartooning generally; you can read more about it on Carolita’s blog, one of my favorite sites on the Thingosphere. Diffee also spoke to NPR in November about all things rejected and collected.
Semi-incidentally, I also notice a Steve Martin interview lurking in the margins there. Nice work, webmasters!
I recently interviewed Diffee at some length myself, for Print, my noble and sassy (it’s true) home base. Want to stick it to the nattering nabobs of new-media naysaying? Buy a beautiful subscription to the magazine whose name sums up everything you love about those words and images you don’t have to squint at onscreen and can even read on the subway without becoming a miniaturist. It’s a fabulous and thoughtful gift, not to mention a steal!

Meghan O’Rourke on Katherine Heigl on Knocked Up: “Maybe There’s a Lot More to Women Than These Expectations”

Sometimes it takes a national event to bring a taboo conversation to the fore. Terry Schiavo’s sad story and the attendant shamelessness of political opportunists, for instance, did have a positive effect: a lot of people finally got a grip and made living wills. Judd Apatow’s movie Knocked Up sparked a lot of debate in the press and at parties about how to deal with unplanned pregnancy between two people who weren’t planning to be together for the long haul, and I bet in a lot of bedrooms and dorm rooms, too. (You may recall that we had an extensive debate about the movie when David Denby wrote an essay about love and lovable-ish losers in the movies for The New Yorker.) More than a spoonful of sugar helped the medicine go down in Knocked Up; the movie is compassionate and funny, and in many respects, startlingly real.

In Slate this week, Meghan O’Rourke considers Katherine Heigl’s mild yet apparently heretical recent remark to Vanity Fair that Knocked Up is “a little sexist.” O’Rourke expands the commentary into a thoughtful essay about cultural expectations of maturity, responsibility, and gender behavior, observing astutely, “A culture that assigns all that weight to what ‘men’ and ‘women’ want only makes it more difficult for couples to establish their own fruitful ratio of intimacy to privacy.”

That Heigl felt it necessary to recant to People at all (thanks to O’Rourke for that link) makes me glum, given that what she said to Vanity Fair was awfully tame. On the other hand, as some of the film-land folks who were at my friend Meg’s wedding this past weekend related, Apatow is so (unsurprisingly) golden in Hollywood these days he’s practically untouchable. There’s a phrase screenwriters use now when they want to make a screenplay or pilot warmer, hipper, more sellable: “Just Judd it up!” And let me say once again that I love this guy. Do you know what I’m doing even as I type? I’m listening to the director’s commentary for Disc 2 of Undeclared, Apatow’s ill-fated, little-known, and totally charming TV series. That’s how much I love this guy.

Also, Knocked Up is a little sexist, a truth Apatow pretty much acknowledged, in a self-aware and relaxed manner, in his recent New Yorker Festival interview with Denby and Seth Rogen. If you haven’t seen the video of the conversation, one of the high points of the festival and a humongous crowd-pleaser, watch it now. So Apatow can admit—as he does at the end of the interview—that he has a lot to learn about women and women characters; Heigl is supposed to pose and smile, and not say anything at all. Now, that seems a little sexist to me.

Meanwhile, Details laments the rise of the twenty- and thirty-something “tweenager” woman, who text-messages her friends “OMG!” and watches Gossip Girl. For some reason this seems to be more frightening to Details than, say, the rest of the TV-watching population, men included, watching Gossip Girl. Maybe it’s because of “the inconvenient truth that men are not as attracted to women over 30,” as a letter-writer in the same issue opines (if women are going to act like girls, they should be as lust-worthy as girls, right?), but there’s a point in there somewhere. Too bad there’s also a pair of twentysomething women wearing knee socks and rollerskates and sucking lollipops in the same issue. Don’t simper like a girl, don’t age like a person, don’t bitch and moan like a grown women—gosh, ya can’t win! (I love the use of “inconvenient truth” there, too. PowerPoint that sucker and you might convince me.)

Till the world is just, you might want to consider donating to the National Network of Abortion Funds, for the people who are, in fact, knocked up and need to make that choice. Apparently, in return for your donation, you’ll get a copy of my friend Katha Pollitt’s great book Learning to Drive, and who’da thunk it, it’s compassionate, funny, and startlingly real, too. (Katha’s written about Knocked Up, too.) But it’s not a competition. Judd Apatow is an honest, sensitive modern man who’s got the grace to say he’s still learning, and I love the guy. Have I mentioned that?

Paris Review Seeks Algonquin Annexation

Know that The Paris Review is auctioning off some very intriguing items through mid-December. A couple of the items are New Yorker-related, so I thought I’d pass them on here. For all intents and purposes, the prices for most of the lots rule out anyone unable to summon one’s accountant to one’s home or office at a moment’s notice, but they are interesting anyway.
The winner of one newly added auction (runs through early January) will be invited to spend a day on the set of Blink, about to be directed by Stephen Gaghan with Leonardo DiCaprio in the lead role. Is it common knowledge that the filming of Blink is nigh? I did not know that Gaghan is attached; might bode well. Filming a work of intellectual speculation of this type may well be unprecedented; I can’t think of any precursors, anyway. Gaghan isn’t exactly my favorite talent out there, but Syriana does suggest that he might be a very good choice for a project this odd, elusive, resonant.
Memo to Philip Gourevitch: You can use the Algonquin Hotel for your tête-à-tête auction prize, but, you know, hands off otherwise. —Martin Schneider

If You Like The Complete New Yorker…

as well you should—I use it every day, and so will you if you obtain it (perhaps as a holiday present?), even if you don’t have a blog about The New Yorker—you should know that the same company that helped create it is now responsible for the digital archives of some other magazines you may want to get to know better:

For the rock ‘n’ rollers on your Christmas list, the hippest gift you can give this year is Rolling Stone Cover To Cover: The First 40 Years (Bondi Digital, $125). All the Rolling Stone magazines from its inception to May 2007 are collected onto fully searchable DVD-ROM disks. You can find every cover story and photo. You can find all the interviews with your favorite rockers from Bob Dylan to John Mayer. You can find the serialized version of Tom Wolfe’s The Bonfire Of The Vanities. The set includes more than 98,000 pages of content, easy to read and printable. Bondi also recently released Playboy Cover To Cover: The 50s ($100) collecting the contents of the first decade of the gentlemen’s magazine, which included the original three-part serialization of Ray Bradbury’s classic Fahrenheit 451. Bondi’s digital platform was used for the release of The Complete New Yorker in 2005.

Thanks to the Clarion-Ledger for the report. The who Clarion-Ledger? The where Clarion-Ledger? It’s always a bit of a treasure hunt on local-newspaper sites. I’ll tell you: Jackson, Mississippi (the recital of all those s’s in kindergarten really pays off later). The paper has quite an interesting history, in fact; a version of it was founded in 1837, and it’s still “one of only a few newspapers in the nation that continues to circulate statewide,” according to the website. Perhaps there will be a digital edition of its early years someday; I sincerely hope so.