Author Archives: Martin

Drama Review: Neil LaBute’s “Wrecks,” Bush Theatre, London

Martin Schneider writes:
Emdashes is a supporter of all forms of live performance, particularly theater, music, and comedy. Friend of Emdashes (and occasional contributor) Quin Browne clearly shares this credo; indeed, she opens her review of the London production of Neil LaBute’s Wrecks with an identical declaration. Quin helped Emdashes cover the 2007 New Yorker Festival, when she reported on Neil LaBute’s lively session with John Lahr. We consider this post a felicitous continuation of that one. Enjoy.
~
There really is nothing like theater.
I had seen Wrecks, written and directed by Neil LaBute, at the Public Theater in New York when it premiered there. I paid for my ticket, I sat in the back row, and I spent the evening on the edge of my seat, leaning forward, chin on hands, while Ed Harris charmed all of us, leading us down the darkish path of Ed Carr, a man who had just lost his beloved wife, JoJo.
When I was notified by the Bush Theatre in London it would be playing during my time here, my actor friend Loo and I decided to see it, so I could enjoy the play again, and she could take it in for the first time. LaBute wasn’t directing, but it was still one of his works, and I do like my LaBute.
The U.K. version starred Robert Glenister and was directed by the Bush’s artistic director, Josie Rourke. Once again, it was a stark, simple set: you walk in, and you are confronted by a casket, nothing more.
It tips you off that this will not be your average play.
And that it isn’t. It’s a 75-minute monologue, delivered by Ed, who takes your hand and leads you down the path of his life, which includes his being raised in foster homes, his discovery of his JoJo, and their courtship and subsequent life together. He tells of his passion for restoring old wrecked classic cars and of their success turning it into a profitable business. He touches lightly on their two daughters and JoJo’s two sons from her previous marriage. The whole focus of his life, it seems, was JoJo, the business—oh, and his almost equally beloved cigarettes, which he puffs all through the show— Wait! You mind if he smokes? You would deny a grieving widower anything in his time of sorrow?
I’m a huge fan of LaBute’s. Unlike some, I don’t find him to be misogynistic in any way. I actually think his men tend to come off as the cads, the wimps, the fearful ones, the ones who don’t quite get what life is all about, who make promises they will never keep. I have maintained that his work has a solid bedrock built on the subject of love—how we abuse it, use it, discard it, steal, cheat, lie, and destroy other people in its name. This particular play is an excellent example of that theory: what we do for love.
This is a lovely, rich, intense monologue, one that holds you steady for the full 75 minutes, a stream-of-consciousness discussion, occasionally referring to the sounds of his other “self” and the other voices that are occasionally piped in, that nice way he has of delivering it, a twist that makes you go, “WTF??” in the last few moments of the show. I heard a nice big gasp from the audience, showing it had been pulled in and rightfully shocked by that moment.
After watching Harris, I was a bit concerned. I mean, Ed Harris? He has you from the first moment with his “join me for a bit of soul searching” smile and those eyes that are a richer blue than you can imagine, crinkling in laughter and smiles, something deep and sad in them the entire time.
Glenister didn’t disappoint. He had a different take on his character, a different delivery, a different pronunciation of “mimeograph” (these things matter!). But he, too, pulled you in, took you with him in his woven storyline; even knowing the twist, I still experienced a slight shock.
The two productions were alike in set, yet vastly different. The Harris work had a shiny black casket, and a very American feel to the funeral setting. The Bush set design is a bit more British: a wood casket, smaller flowers, and a photo of the beloved. Glenister is a shade more casual in his dress, Harris being very crisp in his mourner’s attire. The Bush only seats around 86 people, so there was a wonderful intimate feeling you didn’t get from the Public.
I was pleased by Glenister’s dialect—he sounded very American, and an unconvincing American dialect has caused issues in other London productions of American plays. He carried the flat sound of the Midwest effectively, and I didn’t find it jarring or annoying at all, just, well, American.
LaBute’s script is woven with humor, loss, pride, and that evasive love. His words cling to you, attached to your memory after you’ve left the theater. The lines can soar past, then bounce back to hit you with a solid “THWACK!” Afterward, Loo and I went to a restaurant and I overheard a group discussing the play, discussing with awe and passion their version of four words Ed whispers to his dying Jo (which we never hear). It was interesting to hear other viewpoints, and a compliment to the playwright that the dinner discussion was not what to order but the play and what! and why! and wow!
I highly recommend this play, should you have a chance to see it. London theater remains very affordable; these tickets were less than 18 pounds. The Bush is an amazing venue, and the subject of a petition signing to keep it from closing last year.
Ed Carr is a multilayered, diverse, complex, controlling man who never gave up in his desire to find and keep love. He would do anything for love—anything.

Is Harold Ross a Model for Today’s Strapped Magazine Publishers?

Martin Schneider writes:
It’s common to hear nowadays that the American magazine is doomed. Hearst’s Cathie Black begs to differ, invoking the example of the first years of The New Yorker:

In 1933, a year when every dollar mattered, The New Yorker’s founders, Harold Ross and Raoul Fleischmann, published a Code of Ideals for their magazine. Ignoring the economy, they boldly announced, “Great advertising mediums are operated for the reader first, for profits second.” They got their priorities right: When you truly serve the reader, the advertisers will come.

Those are bracing and inspiring words to hear. You have to admire their guts. No matter how things get, I tend to agree with Black that no matter how bad circumstances get, the industry of selling bits of colored paper with words on them on a weekly, semi-weekly, or monthly basis—is not going to perish anytime soon. I hope I’m right!

Dwell Honors Updike on Modern Skyscrapers

Martin Schneider writes:
It’s well known that the recently departed writer John Updike was a master of most fields he took up: novels, short stories, poetry, literary criticism, art criticism. Friend of Emily and Dwell editor Aaron Britt adds another to the list: architecture criticism. As he writes: “Would that he had been an architecture critic; any discipline would have been lucky to have him.”

Complaint: Damn You, New Yorker, for Being So Good!

Martin Schneider writes:
I don’t think it’s much of a secret that The New Yorker occupies some unusual cultural turf. The New Yorker is known for high quality and also, sometimes, disliked or resented for occupying its position so confidently or unapologetically. As a result you often run into people avowing their dislike for the magazine even as they acknowledge its high quality in the very same breath. One form this takes is disgust over the high piles of worthy issues that amass in the corners of subscribers’ apartments and cause pangs of guilt—an odd reproach at best, and yet understandable.
Yesterday I noticed that one of our nation’s finest political bloggers, native Manhattanite and current Washingtonian Matthew Yglesias, had twittered, “Going to give in and subscribe to The New Yorker.” That piqued my interest, so I wrote him and inquired what constituted “giving in.” Below is his reply—I think it captures a certain paradoxical love/hate attitude towards The New Yorker as well as anything I can think of.

I’m a hater by instinct, and everyone’s great love for the New Yorker (“everyone” here meaning, of course, the kind of people I know) has left me sullen and resentful for years because, honestly, it’s not as good as people say. But over these past few months of roommateless living when I haven’t been able to ever, ever poach a glance at someone else’s copy I’ve been finding something . . . missing from my life. Like really I like the magazine more than I care to admit. So I broke down and subscribed.

In this economic climate, it’s cheering to hear of anyone initiating magazine subscriptions. We hope you enjoy it, Matt! And don’t forget that subscription brings with it free access to every issue the magazine ever published, in the Digital Edition. (Sometimes the word doesn’t get out to subscribers.)

Daniyal Mueenuddin Book Giveaway: Closed for Entries

Martin Schneider writes:
If you can read this, then it’s 8:00 pm Friday evening on the East Coast, which means it’s time to turn on Ghost Whisperer too late to send us an entry to our fabulous Daniyal Mueenuddin giveaway.
In fact, we even have a winner already: Congratulations to Shannon Doherty!
Everyone else, don’t fret: we will be hosting more giveaways like this in no time at all.

Call for Information: Russell Maloney

Martin Schneider writes:
In Comments, Ken Nettleton seeks information on a prominent New Yorker contributor from the past:

Have a very elderly friend whose husband was a Harvard friend of a Russ Maloney (sp?) or Mahoney who worked at the New Yorker and was a contemporary of EB White. His wife’s name was Miriam who was an actress. Belief Mr. Maloney/Mahoney died from an anurysm after he lost his wealth in a failed musical. Would like to find some record (if any) of Mr. M’s writing and what ever happened to his daughter after his wife remarried.

Russell Maloney (not Mahoney) is credited with 387 items in The Complete New Yorker between 1931 and 1948. The vast majority of them are Comments or Talk of the Town items, both of which were unsigned for many years, I believe. So the occasional Profile or short story notwithstanding, it’s likely that readers were not aware of his large impact on The New Yorker in its formative first decades.
According to Wikipedia, Maloney wrote the book and lyrics for a 1948 Broadway musical of The Legend of Sleepy Hollow, which must be the “failed musical” Nettleton mentions. According to Time Magazine, he died in 1948 of a cerebral hemorrhage.
Miriam Maloney is credited with four Talk of the Town items herself. Can anyone help Mr. Nettleton discover what became of their daughter?

Surowiecki Appearance on The Colbert Report: A Palpable Hit

Martin Schneider writes:
Last night, I was pondering something Emdashes-related with a TV on nearby and was suddenly confronted with the visage of James Surowiecki on The Colbert Report (start 8:25, end 11:17).
It’s wonderful to hear the Keynesian Surowiecki of recent “Financial Page” columns and “Balance Sheet” posts get an airing on national TV. (Unsurprisingly, it takes a comedy show to put a guy like Surowiecki on.) Note that Colbert plays fair: nary a syllable of derision in naming his employer—regrettably rare! The joke involves him being knowledgeable, not “hoity-toity.”
Surowiecki advocates dropping money from a helicopter (not as a preference to Obama’s agenda) and leasing Yellowstone Park to the Canadians and all-around makes a great impression. Congratulations, James!

Gawande for Secretary of Health and Human Services?

Martin Schneider writes:
Obama’s nomination for HHS Secretary, Tom Daschle, is withdrawing his name from consideration. Not good news for supporters of comprehensive health care reform. But who will replace him? The name of Howard Dean, a medical doctor, has been mentioned. Ezra Klein is supporting Atul Gawande. I’d support that too. I’m totally starting that rumor, based on no information at all.
Not for nothing, but a few years ago, I reviewed Gawande’s book Better in Publishers Weekly, and I wrote that “one suspects that once we cure the ills of the health care system, we’ll look back and see that Gawande’s writings were part of the story.” And nothing would make that prediction more likely than his joining the Obama administration.