Category Archives: Seal Barks

Paul Noth Unlikely to Win Midwestern Delegates?

First New Yorker cartoonist Matt Diffee pissed off Scranton, PA, although I think they forgave him eventually.
Now, Paul Noth (whom you may know as one of the masterminds behind Conan O’Brien’s Pale Force, among other things) has rattled Sheboygan with a cartoon that, as the local paper puts it, “depicts an expansive suburban landscape with a long wall meandering through it with the caption: ‘The Great Drywall of Sheboygan.'” For its part, Dubuque, which can surely take its New Yorker association for granite (as Pogo would say), seems a little miffed at being left out.
Who’s next? Martin, want to investigate which other town names have been mentioned in cartoons? (Who could forget Roz Chast’s DKNJ?) And what happens if the cartoonist is pardoned? Does he or she get a two-dimensional, Flat Stanley/Harold-esque key to the city, maybe?

Happy February 21st! And What’s Your Favorite Cartoonist Quirk?

I shouldn’t have to tell you what day this is, but in case you’re still in the dark, let this lovely reminiscence enlighten you.
Meanwhile, over at the New Yorker cartoon blog, Michael Maslin has been doing a bang-up job as Cartoonist of the Month. All of his posts so far are worth reading (and seeing!); here’s his partial list of favorite things—visual, conceptual, ocular, sartorial, mechanical, typographical, architectural, nasal, and feline—about his comrades’ cartooning. Off the top of my head, I’d add Carolita Johnson’s befuddled boyfriends, Gahan Wilson’s noses (human and otherwise), Charles Barsotti’s beards, Barbara Smaller’s lamps, William Hamilton’s gravity-defying bosoms, and Matt Diffee’s pigeons, among others. How about you?

A Little More Background on Crumb’s “Elvis Tilley”

Martin Schneider writes:
The “New Yorker Out Loud” podcast featured an intriguing revelation this week, and I thought I’d draw a little more attention to it.
In recent weeks Emily has followed the Eustace Tilley contest with understandably keen interest. It’s worth recalling that this manner of remix or appropriation was once less customary—it was a mere 14 years ago that the iconic annual Eustace Tilley cover was “messed with” by the great R. Crumb. Since 1993 we’ve seen all kinds of versions by Art Spiegelman (1997), Chris Ware (2005), Seth (2008), and many others.
I wasn’t living in the United States at the time, so it was difficult for me to gauge the uproar, but I’ve heard that Crumb’s image of “Elvis Tilley,” whom The New York Times described as “a squinting, pointy-nosed street punk with a marked resemblance to his grandfather,” caused something of a stir.
Matt Dellinger interviewed Françoise Mouly this week for the podcast, and she divulged the back story to the cover:

Dellinger: The first time you updated Eustace Tilley, it was for a portfolio inside the magazine. It wasn’t until your second year, in 1994, that you did it on the cover.
Mouly: It took a while before we could do it on the cover, because you may not judge a book by its cover, but you judge a magazine by its cover! … and it has to represent a kind of consensus. Ironically enough, that moment happened through somebody who had no other connection to the magazine, Robert Crumb, longtime friend…. and I’d asked him, as soon as I started here, to do a cover for The New Yorker, and he sent me this image, and it’s a young man looking at a flyer. And it just so happened to be on the sidewalk right in front of the building where our offices were at the time, on 42nd Street. So I recognized the sidewalk, and I was like, “Well why is he doing this young man with a flyer, okay….” I showed it to Tina, I was somewhat puzzled, and we accepted it as a cover to run, and it’s only like weeks after that I’m looking at it and I’m going, “Oh my god! Oh my god! It’s Eustace Tilley!” It just….
Dellinger: So neither of you saw it, neither of you understood….
Mouly: No, no! Because it’s actually very subtle, there’s no top hat, there is no butterfly….
Dellinger: Right, it’s a kid in a red baseball cap, on backwards, he’s looking actually not at a monocle but at a porn flyer.
Mouly: We have it up on our website, actually. Yeah, so, all there was of Eustace Tilley—he’s in a street, he’s not wearing a waistcoat, there’s no signifier, it’s a profile of somebody … the only thing is the looking down at what you’re looking at, the kind of supercilious look. That’s what Robert got and completely repackaged it. It was too beautiful to not do it, by the time we did it as the first “breaking” of the anniversary issue. I think everybody in the office, the other editors, had given up on any kind of decency on the cover anymore, so….

Fascinating. I had always assumed that the cover was a sensation concocted by Mouly, her husband Art Spiegelman, and their boss Tina Brown, to goose the staider portions of the magazine’s subscriber base. How charming to learn that the whole thing was not a corporate provocation but an affectionate joke from the fertile mind of Crumb!

Tilleymania Continues With Anniversary Issue

From MinOnline (mysterious itals in original):

“With today’s (February 4) release of the February 11-18 anniversary issue, current editor (since July 1998) David Remnick goes a politically correct (if you’re a Democrat) step further with what he and his staff are calling Eustace Tillarobama. Split-run (above left) has either Hillary or Barack on the top, and distribution to subscribers is random. Perfect timing before tomorrow’s (February 5) Super Tuesday primaries, when, perhaps, one of them will really be on top. Artists are Rea Irvin and Seth (no last name).

Here’s the online portfolio of neo-Tilley winners at newyorker.com, not to mention a swell audio conversation about the contest with Françoise Mouly and Matt Dellinger. As Mouly reminds us, should you be tempted to forget, Rea Irvin was kidding around the first time. (Maybe even more than we knew!)

Will the Winners of the Tilley Contest Also Appear in the Magazine?

I dunno, but this post by Len at the Jawbone Radio Show in Cleveland, who’s been notified that one of his entries has been selected as a winner of the Eustace Tilley competition (congratulations!), makes me curious. Len writes: “The art will be published on Monday on the New Yorker.com and there is a slight chance that I may make it into the print edition as well. I’ll be sure to publish more info as soon as I know it.” A little gallery in the print edition would be a treat, but even if the winners’ circle is online-only, it’s been a great contest for all involved. I’m sure Rea Irvin would have been thoroughly amused.
In case you were wondering, or, as the wise Cary Tennis would say, Since You Asked, I only repeat conjectures I hear from outside the magazine and Condé Nast generally, specifically those already reported elsewhere. That is, I ignore most of them, but I make note of the ones I think dedicated readers of The New Yorker will find interesting. As Jean Hagen once said in her corrosive platinum, “What do they think I am, dumb or something?” More to the point, don’t we have enough of a gossip culture as it is?

Eustace Tilley Contest: Could You Be the Next Rea Irvin?

Perhaps not, but it’s certainly worth a try. Click through to Boing Boing for details of the magazine’s new online competition, the results of which are sure to be a monocled, lepidopteran hoot.
The contest is being held on Flickr rather than newyorker.com; the image specs and rules appear there and also here. The group has 32 members so far, including me.
Over on Flog!, by the way, Fantagraphics maestro Eric Reynolds makes a sly reference in his report on the contest by heading his post “Johnny Ryan, are you reading?” I shall explain: Ryan, author of the singularly disgusting yet strangely mesmerizing Angry Youth Comix, included a nearsighted, um, awe-inducing character he called The New Yorker in a recent edition. I will append only three very tame panels from the storyline after the jump; pursue this further at your own risk.

johnny_ryan_angryyouthcomix.jpg


Click to enlarge; reprinted with permission. Caveat lector!

Breaking: The New Yorker Cartoonists Have a Blog of Their Own

More later since I’m working, but this is very exciting news. Cartoonist and online cartoonist shepherd Mick Stevens will be the blog’s first “captain,” and it’ll rotate every month. Dare we hope that Roz Chast, Bruce Eric Kaplan, Eric Lewis, Drew Dernavich, Liza Donnelly, Gahan Wilson, the already very webby Emily Richards, Ed Koren, Matt Diffee, Harry Bliss, Marisa Acocella Marchetto, Charles Barsotti, Michael Crawford, and dear pal of Emdashes (and blogeuse extraordinaire) Carolita Johnson—not to mention scores more of our favorites—will be among the captains to come?

Caption Contest Winner Lewis Gatlin of Elizabeth City, N.C…

Please get in touch! As you recall, you won Cartoon Caption Contest #2, the Leo Cullum drawing, with “This is my stop. Phil, you’ll be C.E.O. till Sixty-third Street.” We’re sad that we hadn’t yet started doing detailed interviews with caption winners, and we’d (specifically, a writer we just persuaded to do an interview, and who picked you specifically as an interview subject) love to talk to you in a friendly and nonthreatening manner. Alternately, if you work at the Cartoon Bank and have Lewis Gatlin’s email address, or if you’re Leo Cullum and you’d like to chat with us as well, we’d love that, too!

Everyone Knows Your Caption’s a Clip-On: Behind the Scenes of the Contest

As promised, today Daniel Radosh presents the results of Matt “Rejection Collection” Diffee’s caption-contest investigation: What were the original captions before they were stripped to make way for America’s merry endeavors? Drew Dernavich (who chatted with the contest winner about the “Everyone knows your parrot’s a clip-on” drawing for Emdashes) contributes two, and Tom Cheney and Frank Cotham have one each. I especially like the amusing juxtaposition of the winning, Radosh Anti-Caption Contest, and original captions.
Also in humor today, the latest edition of thoroughly lovable comedian Mike Birbiglia’s “My Secret Public Journal” has a sharp election-season observation:

Rudy Giuliani kind of scares me. I kind of feel like Rudy thinks 9/11 is his birthday. He gets that excited look on his face and buys himself a cake and lights two candles and watches them burn down. And then he looks around and says, “What do I get?” And his advisors are like “$15 million in speaking fees!” and he’s like, “That’s even better than last 9/11!”

And in the Wall St. Journal, there’s a review of William F. Buckley’s book Cancel Your Own Goddam Subscription that parades some New Yorker cliches so sleepy they’re unfit to operate heavy machinery. If you say only three things about the magazine, say these three! It’s a surefire crowd-pleaser.

And Speaking of Cartoons, a Voice From the Past

…my past, that is: I’m not sure how I missed this, but recently for the Voice, the veteran (by which I don’t mean old, just savvy) arts and sports writer Brian Parks compiled a humor batting-average chart for the “fall season” of New Yorker cartooning and ranked them by “humor success percentage,” which soars as high as .556. I’d like to know more about his criteria; Brian, give us some insight into your rankings! Brian is not only a friend from that long-ago millennium of which I so rarely speak, but the author of two of the funniest plays known to modern American drama, Vomit & Roses and Wolverine Dream, known in tandem as Americana Absurdum. So the guy knows funny when he sees it, but my question is, where did he see it?