Author Archives: Emdashes

Bob Mankoff on David Marc Fischer, the Winningest Non-Winner We Knew

Emily Gordon writes:
Recently, everyone at Emdashes was saddened by the death of David Marc Fischer, a dear friend of our site and of The New Yorker‘s cartoon caption contest. The following tribute is by The New Yorker‘s Bob Mankoff, and we think David would have loved it (click to enlarge the image):

In his “Blog About Town,” David Marc Fischer meticulously catalogued The New Yorker‘s Cartoon Caption Contest, including his 179 consecutive non-winning entries. Upon learning of this lovely man’s untimely passing, I went back and meticulously reviewed all of his entries, looking for the one that would best honor him and his devotion to the contest. I think this one, from contest 150, fits the bill.

–Bob Mankoff, Cartoon Editor, The New Yorker magazine

captiondmf.jpg

R.I.P., David Marc Fischer, Devoted New Yorker Blogger and Extraordinary Friend

Emily Gordon writes:
There are no words to describe the sadness we feel at the death of David, the man behind (among many other projects and passions) Blog About Town, who was a friend of The New Yorker, particularly its cartoons and cartoonists; an unwavering friend of Emdashes who always encouraged us to do our odd but heartfelt job more creatively and uncompromisingly; and a friend of mine. I could never match his generosity or his ingenuity in getting fellow New Yorkers to ditch their work-crazed ruts and get together, out to dinner, out to a play. His list of loyalists was the loyalest.
The last time we emailed, he invited me to see Twelfth Night. I couldn’t go. Here’s a short post he wrote about the play and its famous riddle about the initials M.O.A.I. In the comments (he was an active and conscientious commenter, including on his own posts), he wrote:

Methinks that M. O. A. I. could very well be a red herring, meant to torture Malvolio with its unsolvability. However: Now that I’ve (just) read about it containing the outer letters of Malvolio’s name, I also realize that continuing the progression would produce L. L. O. V., which is something close to love. That’s also plausible to me.

It’s a shocking loss, not least because it was so unexpected. He’ll keep his place of honor in the Emdashes Rossosphere for all time. Maybe someone else will take up the project of faithfully chronicling the New Yorker‘s Cartoon Caption Contest, mapping the winners, and tracking Daniel Radosh’s always hysterically anarchic Anti-Caption Contest. But no one will do it with so much L.L.O.V.

Later: Here’s a nice post about David from Radosh.net.

And later: Yesterday’s memorial service was one of the most touching occasions I’ve ever witnessed. I’ve been to three funerals in recent months for people far too young to die: Andrew Johnston, Michal Kunz, and David. It’s disquieting to hear eulogies by and for one’s peers (of course, one must also get used to this). But there’s an energetic, offbeat quality to such tributes that I can only describe as youthful, and that can be cathartic and apropos, too.

The first person to speak was the photographer Matt Mendelsohn, who knew David for almost all of their 46 years, and, with Matt’s permission, I wanted to share this part of his tribute with you. The caption contest line, you’ll be glad to know, got an enormous laugh. Everyone knew how passionate David was about the contest, but I didn’t realized he’d entered it so many times. And I didn’t know till yesterday that the huge group of passions and communities David either formed or enthusiastically promoted was just the tip of the iceberg. You wouldn’t believe how many people he was connected to, and how many people he connected. As another friend observed, “He was a giver.”

David was the smartest, brainiest, most loyal, most culturally aware friend I’ve ever had. He was interested in everything and he was interesting about everything. That is to say, there was no topic off bounds or out-of-reach for David. No subject, highbrow or lowbrow, he was unable to add a cogent, witty, insightful comment on. As a child, that could have been a topic of mild importance, say, the assumption to the presidency of Gerald Ford in 1974; of moderate importance, like the jazz trombone stylings of his idol, Bill Watrous; or, one of dire, absolute importance, like the groundbreaking 1968 Patrick McGoohan television series The Prisoner.

As an adult, that could mean a topic of mild importance, like the election of Barack Obama; of moderate importance, like discussing his one hundred and seventy-nine consecutive non-winning entries in the New Yorker Cartoon Caption Contest; or, finally, a topic of dire, absolute importance, like the groundbreaking 1968 Patrick McGoohan television series The Prisoner.

David, young or old, was a collector of culture, a guardian of civility. You never so much as argued with David as debated him cordially. It’s no surprise that in the 1980’s, when Life magazine still published monthly, David was the Letters to the Editor editor. In an age now, when anonymous and vicious comments on the internet are run amok, the notion of David vetting every published letter for accuracy and intelligence seems downright quaint. But that’s just what he excelled at. He was a lifeline to a more literate and worldly world. The last postings on Blog About Town, the New York diary he kept up for years, include, quite randomly, tips for securing Shakespeare in the Park tickets, a word-for-word handicapping of the National Spelling Bee (“Kavya Shavashankar gets a huge Monty Python word, “Blancmange,” and swallows it whole; Kyle Mou gets lucky, I think, by drawing avoirdupois–and he takes full advantage of the situation”), and, finally, an old clip of the French songwriter Charles Trenet singing his 1946 classic “La Mer,” in his native tongue, long before Bobby Darrin re-wrote it into a hit song in 1959. Not knowing anything about Charles Trenet, I watched the clip, read the translation and thought to myself, “Wow, the original is so much more poetic.”

Will I someday use this morsel of knowledge David just gave me? I’m not sure. Like all of his wisdom, I’ve filed it in my brain, and someday it will find its way back out and into a conversation. These are the little gifts David loved to give.

Palin’s Speech, the Founding Dads, and Hertzberg’s Hilarity

Emily Gordon writes:
So, my dad sent me this very funny–funny for nerds, which is us–link to the corrections to Sarah Palin’s speech by the Vanity Fair literary editor and the magazine’s copy and research departments. (Martin’s already noted it, because he’s quick on the draw that way.)
I sent it on to my dear friends and former employers at The Nation‘s copy department, as I am wont to do, and my fleet former boss, Roane Carey, now the magazine’s managing editor, wrote back with this quotable observation, which, with his permission, I quoth:

I can’t wait to read this, but I also thought parts of Hertzberg’s leader in the latest New Yorker were hilarious–comparing, in sober, reflective language, Palin’s resignation speech with that of the Founders: “And, indeed, her speech had echoes of the document signed in Philadelphia two hundred and thirty-three years and one day earlier.” Hertzberg cites Jefferson on political change, then quotes Palin (unintelligible, of course) on same. More fun than a barrel of monkeys.

I agree. And while I’m sure Hertzberg is as big a Dylanophile as anyone, I wonder if the Talk’s inspired epigraph originated with his boss, since I’ve heard he’s a low-key, Sunday sort of fan o’ Bob.

What’s the Future of Print? Find Out Tonight at an NYC Panel With Emdashes Founder & Print Magazine Editor, Not to Mention Smart, Entertaining Others!

Emily Gordon writes in her other persona as editor of Print magazine, whose website is about to be completely relaunched, thank the Al Gore:
What’s going to happen to print (lowercase p)? If I figure it out by tonight, I’ll tell you! I’m on a panel about independent magazines at the Art Directors Club, 106 West 29th St. (bt. 6th and 7th), from 6:30-8:30 p.m. tonight. Yes, tonight! I know you’ve got a lot of summer invites, but this will be a lot of fun, and not depressing at all, I promise. I’d love to see you there, friends & fellow magazineers!
Here’s the full description:
colo_NY.jpg
On Wednesday, July 8, Colophon in collaboration with the Art Directors Club hosts a unique presentation and discussion about independent magazines entitled “The Future of Print.” This is an essential event for anyone involved in the creative industries.
In recent years, an explosion of independent magazines has reinvigorated the medium of print. Freed from the constraints of the mainstream, independent magazines continually innovate and experiment for their devoted readers around the world. Energetic, groundbreaking, and unafraid, these are magazines for readers who believe that print is still a vibrant medium. Colophon, in collaboration with the Art Directors Club, investigates The Future of Print through a panel discussion featuring editors and publishers from Capricious, Print, Woooooo!, and The Nation.
To celebrate the launch of the new book We Make Magazines–Inside The Independents, published in conjunction with the Colophon Independent Magazine Biennale, Colophon and the Art Directors Club in New York presents a unique discussion event, exploring key issues around independent publishing with major figures from New York’s independent publishing scene.
Panel Moderator: Andrew Losowsky, Co-curator, Colophon and Editor, We Make Magazines
Panelists:
* Sophie Mörner, founder and publisher, Capricious
* Emily Gordon, editor-in-chief, Print
* Jason Crombie, editor and founder, Woooooo!
* Claudia Wu, Me Magazine
Topics:
* What makes magazines special
* The secrets to publishing success
* The importance of creative independence
* Whether you can make money from a passion project
* What’s next for print.
Wednesday, July 8, 2009
6:30-8:30 pm
ADC Gallery
106 West 29th Street, NYC
ADC Members: Free
Non-Members: $5 at the door
RSVP by clicking the button below.

No Way–The Baffler Is Back!

Emily Gordon, who attended several Baffler parties in the nineties but was recently and, considering her age, flatteringly counseled to avoid the phrase “back in the day” because she isn’t old enough to use it, writes:
This is great news! As usual, the Observer‘s Leon Neyfakh has the story.
Long live magazines! You know me–I don’t say these things ironically.

In Which We Celebrate Pollux, Our Staff Cartoonist, and His 30th Birthday Today

TheBanjoist_byPaulMorris.jpg
Emily Gordon writes:
Can I imagine life without the cartoonist-writer-painter-animator-multimedia artist-graphic designer-comrade-confidante-friend known to Emdashes readers as the daily comic commentator Pollux? No, I cannot.
Paul Morris arrived at my virtual doorstep in January 2008 like an encyclopedia salesman, except that the encyclopedia he was selling was himself, and he asked for no down payment. He soon became my co-conspirator in the quest to reinstall founding New Yorker art director Rea Irvin in the collective mind as the uncompromising impresario he was.
Not long after that, I started reading Paul’s online comic, “Arnjuice,” noting how the drawings’ elegant angles and intense conservation of line mirrored the dialogue’s dreamy humor and sharp insight into the vagaries of the human animal. As I dug deeper into his oevre, which is not a word you can use for the output of every twentysomething, and caught a glimpse of its fine art (like these recent portraits of jazz musicians—that’s “The Banjoist,” above), I further observed how Paul’s Spanish and British heritage expressed themselves in all his work in linguistically limber, deeply colorful, and agreeably dissonant ways. I was impressed.
So I asked on a whim if he was willing to draw a comic for Emdashes. He was. We named it “The Wavy Rule” after Irvin’s famous wiggly dividing lines. I was thinking of some sort of regular contribution; Paul made it daily. We needed someone to fill in on a few written posts for the blog; he did it so charmingly that he now writes a weekly column just about the cover art of The New Yorker. He stands at the essential center of the Emdashes tapestry along with Martin Schneider, Benjamin Chambers, Jonathan Taylor, Erin Overbey, and Jon Michaud, all of whom I applaud daily, if not hourly. How this all happens every day—often, these days, without me even clicking my mouse—is a never-ending source of wonderment. Paul, like everyone I name above, is (as Dylan Thomas would say) the force that through the green fuse drives the flower.
In short, we are in awe. That this is going to make him radish-red with embarrassment is one of the reasons he is so beloved to us. We here at the disparate dots on Google Maps known as Emdashes HQ celebrate all that is Paul, Pollux, and everything he is set to become. We couldn’t do without him, and we wish him a very happy birthday indeed.

You Don’t Have to Read Gawker to Know That Americans Are Short

Emily Gordon writes:
Gawker notes today that an Organisation for Economic Co-operating and Development study is reporting alarming (to some) news that Americans aren’t getting taller, even though people in the other countries in the OECD (including Canada and the U.K.) are inching steadily upward.
But New Yorker-ophiles will remember Burkhard Bilger’s findings back in April 2004, in his Reporter at Large called “The Height Gap.” Bilger writes, in part:

Walking along the canals of Amsterdam and Delft, I had an odd sensation of drowning–not because the crowds were so thick but because I couldn’t lift my head above them. I’m five feet ten and a half–about an inch taller than the average in the United States–but, like most men I know, I tend to round the number up. Tall men, a series of studies has shown, benefit from a significant bias. They get married sooner, get promoted quicker, and earn higher wages. According to one recent study, the average six-foot worker earns a hundred and sixty-six thousand dollars more, over a thirty-year period, than his five-foot-five-inch counterpart–about eight hundred dollars more per inch per year. Short men are unlucky in politics (only five of forty-three Presidents have been shorter than average) and unluckier in love. A survey of some six thousand adolescents in the nineteen-sixties showed that the tallest boys were the first to get dates. The only ones more successful were those who got to choose their own clothes.

The average American man is only five feet nine and a half–less than an inch taller than the average soldier during the Revolutionary War. Women, meanwhile, seem to be getting smaller. According to the National Center for Health Statistics–which conducts periodic surveys of as many as thirty-five thousand Americans–women born in the late nineteen-fifties and early nineteen-sixties average just under five feet five. Those born a decade later are a third of an inch shorter.

Just in case I still thought this a trivial trend, Komlos put a final bar graph in front of me. It was entitled “Life Expectancy 2000.” Compared with people in thirty-six other industrialized countries, it showed, Americans rank twenty-eighth in average longevity–just above the Irish and the Cypriots (the Japanese top the rankings). “Ask yourself this,” Komlos said, peering at me above his reading glasses. “What is the difference between Western Europe and the U.S. that would work in this direction? It’s not income, since Americans, at least on paper, have been wealthier for more than a century. So what is it?”

Well, which would you rather read, some chart or the mellifluous Bilger? I’m going to read this one again, and for the record, I’m 5’7″ on my very best days.

It Does Not Matter Where You Write as Long as You Write Responsibly and Well

Emily Gordon quotes:
“The whole blogger versus journalist debate that might have existed around 2004 is dead. Over. Stale. Uninteresting. I couldn’t care less — it’s a meaningless debate to have. What’s more interesting to me is what a blog means now.”
–Sewell Chan, from “So What Do You Do, Sewell Chan, New York Times City Room Bureau Chief?” (MediaBistro)