Can the eminent and august be lightly kidded? Sure, we think so. In today’s “Wavy Rule,” Paul considers the mountainous refuge of Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn–who died last week, and whom we admired. David Remnick did a Letter From Moscow about the writer in 2001, and Blake Eskin notes The New Yorker‘s coverage of the great Russian over the years. We are glad to contribute this cartoon to the conversation. Click to enlarge! Here’s Paul:
Fun facts: Solzhenitsyn lived in Cavendish, Vermont, from 1977 to 1994. Locals protected his privacy. He attended town meetings, and his children attended the local schools. There’s a good NPR story about his time in Vermont here. Below, a plausible scene of northern discontent.
![]()
More by Paul Morris: Enter our exciting contest to name the upside-down question-mark! Entries accepted until August 25. Plus, “The Wavy Rule” archive; a very funny webcomic, “Arnjuice“; a motley Flickr page; various beautifully off-kilter cartoon collections for sale and free download at Lulu.
Monthly Archives: August 2008
LES-ez Faire: Live and Let (Yuppie Scum) Live?
Martin Schneider writes:
There’s more suggestive and principled oddness in this paragraph by Gothamist’s John Del Signore than in a number of novels I’ve read. I can’t decide which of the guys in this story I like more.
The Wavy Rule, a Daily Comic by Paul Morris: Sideways
In today’s avian “Wavy Rule,” Paul continues the whimsically sinister wine label series he began with a grisly pinot grigio. In this edition, a cab takes its name from some disturbingly immobile residents of the vineyard. Click to enlarge!
![]()
More by Paul Morris: Enter our exciting contest to name the upside-down question-mark! Entries accepted until August 25. Plus, “The Wavy Rule” archive; a very funny webcomic, “Arnjuice“; a motley Flickr page; various beautifully off-kilter cartoon collections for sale and free download at Lulu.
Two Months, Two Events: Mouly, Als, Spiegelman
Martin Schneider writes:
Who was it who said that comic books have recently become Hollywood’s R&D department? (It may have been “Everyone.”) The remarkable Françoise Mouly has decided—rightly—that the medium can also serve a similar function for children’s books, so (as Emily reported in PRINT) she has started an imprint called TOON Books, which puts out comix-inspired books for our youngest readers. (Her true aim may well be to propagate an entire generation of Los Bros Hernandez addicts.) She has enlisted the talents of Dean Haspiel, Jay Lynch, Eleanor Davis, and her husband, Art Spiegelman, to create the books, all of whom will be appearing twelve noon, Saturday, September 6, for a “Special Saturday Storytime” at McNally Jackson Books (note the new name) at 52 Prince Street. (Collectors: leave your Sharpies at home! Nobody present will be signing souvenirs. It’s for the kids, you know.)
And if we’ve now whetted your appetite for events without immediate opportunity for gratification, you can always check out the round table with New Yorker drama critic Hilton Als and Richard Foreman, guiding spirit of the Ontological-Hysteric Theater, at Solas (232 E. 9th St.) this Thursday night at 7:30pm. The event is free, as such affairs in summer ought to be.
Special Guest Post: Revisiting John McPhee on NYC’s Greenmarkets
Our friend Jonathan Taylor writes:
I saw this news of a vendor ejected from New York City’s Greenmarket farmers markets, for offering products not raised on his own farm, just after I read John McPhee’s “Giving Good Weight,” an article on the markets from the July 3, 1978, New Yorker. (Not online; link is to abstract.) The Greenmarket program had only begun in 1976. McPhee worked for several months for Hodgson Farm of Newburgh, N.Y., manning stands (in “black Harlem,” Union Square, the Upper East Side and Brooklyn) and observing the initial interactions between farmers–who were new to selling on the streets of the city–and urbanites, who were often clueless about agriculture but, of course, were also finicky know-it-alls.
“Giving Good Weight” was reprinted in a 1979 book of the same title. Also in that volume is “Brigade de Cuisine,” a lengthy portrait (from the Feb. 19, 1979, issue) of a Tri-State-area country farmhouse restaurant so superb, and so happily off the Manhattanite radar, that McPhee insisted on concealing the real identities of the establishment and its chef, “Otto.” Farmers markets, and a restaurant said to be secretly the best table within 100 miles of Manhattan: both of these could be topics of articles you’d read in The New Yorker (or New York) today–but together, they suggest how the business of informed eating has changed over the past 30 years.
As described by McPhee, the early markets are recognizable, but differ from the epicenters of that brand of local and sustainable consumption that now defines the city’s aspirational food culture. McPhee glancingly notes just one “organic” producer, in quotation marks. Many of those first vendors came to the market as last-ditch effort to save a generations-old farm from ruin. The “grow-your-own” rule was in effect from the beginning, although then, at least, there was a provision for supplementing with small amounts of a “neighbor’s” crops.
McPhee saw the farmers–“friendly from the skin out, they are deep competitors”–accuse each other, sometimes even justly, of offenses that today would be more scandalous than Dines’s: acquiring produce trucked in to the Hunts Point Terminal in the Bronx, and passing it off as their own. But the growers and the Greenmarket organizers were still taking risks on each other in pursuing their common goal, the markets’ success; in this freewheeling atmosphere, a crate of California peaches earns only the stern, readily obeyed order from a Greenmarket official: “They must go back on the truck.”
The Greenmarket program was established in response to a situation in which “New Yorkers complained of brown lettuce and hard tomatoes while local farms went bankrupt,” in the program’s own words. In McPhee’s words, it provided “tumbling horns of fresh plenty at the people’s feet,” in something like an Old World market day, where the full spectrum of New Yorkers descended to drive a hard bargain. McPhee calls the Brooklyn market “the most cornucopian of all” and “a nexus of the race”:
Greeks. Italians. Russians. Finns. Haitians. Puerto Ricans. Nubians. Muslim women in veils of shocking pink. Sunnis in total black. Women in hiking shorts, with babies in their backpacks. Young Connecticut-looking pants-suit women…country Jamaicans, in loose dresses…white-bearded, black-bearded, split-bearded Jews. Down off Park Slope and Cobble Hill come the neo-bohemians, out of the money and into the arts.
When McPhee would arrive in the early morning hours at the lot, the Brooklyn market then occupied, at Atlantic and Fourth Avenues, “a miscellany of whores is calling it a day.” (The site, I believe, is now a P.C. Richard.)
Taken together, today’s markets probably offer up a similarly kaleidoscopic vision, although with 45 locations now, the stratification that McPhee observed between the Brooklyn “nexus of the race” and the 59th Street market (“Mucho white people,” another seller said) is even more advanced. For many customers’ dollars, markets compete not so much with the brown lettuce of bodegas, but with Whole Foods and pricey specialty stores. Much as I think market produce is worth every penny, I doubt I’ll ever hear, “How can you charge so little?” as McPhee did.
That dialogue between growers and customers is the meat, so to speak, of McPhee’s piece:
Woman says, “What is this stuff on these peaches?”
“It’s called fuzz.”
“It was on your peaches last week, too.”
“We don’t take it off. When you buy peaches in the store, the fuzz has been rubbed off.”
“Well, I never.”
Today, the repartee between the metropolitans and those who sustain them (and whom they sustain in turn) goes on; it’s more elaborate, now that the regulars are more preoccupied with the food they eat and how it came to be. Management consultant-turned-hot pepper and tomato grower Tim Stark describes, in the August issue of Gourmet (not online), the conversational duels he has to engage in with capsicum freaks and deeply skeptical West Indian women just to make a couple bucks’ sale. McPhee’s Hodgson Farm, by the way, is still at the Union Square market.
(Another fine account by a writer working a spell for a New York Greenmarket vendor–although on the farm rather than at the markets–is the one by poet and novelist James Lasdun‘s in the London Review of Books.)
“Brigade de Cuisine” is even more of a blast from the past, and I found it a bit embarrassing to read even before I found out what happened when the piece was published. The accolades that David Chang gets are nothing to McPhee’s opening pronunciation that meals at “Otto’s” resaurant would occupy the first “twenty or thirty” spots on his all-time list of best repasts–eventually followed, “perhaps,” by “the fields of Les Baux or the streets of Lyons.” (McPhee probably does have such a list; in 2007 he wrote in The New Yorker about his “life list” of the unusual foods he’s eaten.) This was taken as a brazen insult to the city’s restauranteurs, compounded by Otto’s dismissal of New York’s ranking French restaurants as “frog ponds.” (The magazine subsequently ran a note saying that Otto had “guessed wrong” when he suggested to McPhee that Lutece’s turbot was frozen.)
This Time article nicely describes the ensuing caper: New York Times critic Mimi Sheraton identified, and panned, Otto’s table within days. (Otto, a.k.a. Alan Lieb, had, by the time McPhee’s article came out, moved on to a new restaurant, the Bullhead Inn in Shohola, in northeastern Pennsylvania.) More details of the aftermath are in Sheraton’s memoir Eating My Words. She wrote that “many years later,” she “unwittingly” dined at Lieb’s subsequent restaurant in the Poconos, but gives no further details “because it is no longer of public interest.”
Reading “Brigade de Cuisine” today, it’s not hard to conclude that McPhee was too easily impressed, as he worshipfully recounts Otto’s every move: “His way of making coffee is to line a colander with a linen napkin and drip the coffee through the napkin.” McPhee invites the reader (in vain, in my case) to fantasize about being able to follow Otto around New York and imitate him: “With luck, you will be seated at a table near him. Listen. Watch. He orders spiedino. You order spiedino…. He orders a bottle of Verdicchio. You order a bottle of Verdicchio.”
Most of Otto’s actual cuisine sounds stuffy and old-fashioned (veal cordon bleu), standard (osso buco) or sometimes just unappetizing (“sauteed chicken breasts with apple-cider sauce”), rather than visionary. It conjures the obsolete mode of food appreciation that went by the name “gourmet,” a word that now sounds quaint in the “foodie” world that encompasses Thomas Keller and the Red Hook ballfields, Chowhound and Top Chef.
McPhee contrasts Otto’s restaurant with the industrialization of even somewhat upscale restaurants, visiting Idle Wild Farm Inc., a provider of frozen “instant entrees” to “kitchenless kitchens.” He implies that his desire to keep Otto’s identity secret is intended to protect the last of a dying breed: the restaurant where fresh, seasonal food is cooked carefully by a perfectionist chef for an intimate group of regular appreciants. But apart from the merits of his dishes, in this respect Otto’s enterprise seems a precursor to modern priorities rather than “the wave of the past,” as McPhee wrote. There are certainly as many factory-made entrees by the likes of Idle Wild being served, in casual-dining and hotel restaurants, as McPhee might have feared. But his description of Otto–whom another acolyte calls “the last great individualist”–reads in many ways like almost a parody of the archetypical hot New York chef of today.
It’s easy to say that with hindsight, but this points to what strikes me as a shortcoming in both pieces: a certain lack of perspective, a tunnel vision. Though McPhee is recording change–a new way of buying food in New York, a seeming decline in culinary craftsmanship–his writing here lacks, for me, enough of a sense of the specificity, the contingency of the moment: a sensibility found (if sometimes to a portentous fault) in the work of other great chroniclers like Joan Didion, George Trow, Renata Adler. McPhee’s especial drive to get into the thick of things, materially, might serve his writings on nature better than it does social subjects like this one. But it does preserve invaluable raw material for food anthropologists of New York, professional and amateur, and that’s satisfying nourishment.
The Wavy Rule, a Daily Comic by Paul Morris: Snow-Capped Ivory Tower
Paul explains today’s pleasantly frosty “Wavy Rule”:
My inspiration comes from my re-reading of that wonderful book by Simon Winchester, The Meaning of Everything: The Story of the Oxford English Dictionary. A must-read. (Oh, and I’m all out of Augie Vasterbotten the Lexicographer commemorative T-shirts.)
![]()
More by Paul Morris: Enter our exciting contest to name the upside-down question-mark! Entries accepted until August 25. Plus, “The Wavy Rule” archive; a very funny webcomic, “Arnjuice“; a motley Flickr page; various beautifully off-kilter cartoon collections for sale and free download at Lulu.
Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, 1918-2008
A great redwood falls. Here’s the New York Times obituary. David Remnick is quoted several times in the piece:
David Remnick, the editor of The New Yorker, who has written extensively about the Soviet Union and visited Mr. Solzhenitsyn, wrote in 2001: “In terms of the effect he has had on history, Solzhenitsyn is the dominant writer of the 20th century. Who else compares? Orwell? Koestler? And yet when his name comes up now, it is more often than not as a freak, a monarchist, an anti-Semite, a crank, a has been.”
Speaking of greats, here’s the writeup of the William Maxwell celebration at Madison Square Park the other day, by our friend Ron Hogan.
Looking Back at the Future, Circa 1964
Benjamin Chambers writes:
What did the future look like back in 1964? Here’s a clue: this rather puzzling cartoon by Alan Dunn (click to see it full-size) from the October 3, 1964 issue of The New Yorker.
![]()
Judging from the globe in the background, you probably could find phone booths like the one drawn here at the 1964 New York World’s Fair. So far, so good. But what the heck is the kid riding in, and what’s so funny about the cartoon?
As to the first question, the Complete New Yorker index describes the kid as sitting in an “automobile pushcart.” Perhaps these were commonly available at the World’s Fair, perhaps not—but I don’t think it’s supposed to attract our attention. Instead, the kid’s dismayed look tells us what’s funny: the phone booth itself.
No doubt such booths were a radical departure from the full-size, glassed-in phone booths typical of the period, an intimation of the future. (Though those were not as ubiquitous as I thought. According to “this advertisement”:http://www.phonebooth.org/phoneadverts/portrait_of_a_city.html posted by the folks at “The Phonebooth”:http://www.phonebooth.org/index.html, the first outdoor telephone booths weren’t installed in Manhattan until around 1960.) Is it possible that the joke here is simply that the kid can’t see his mother? Your ideas welcome.
[UPDATE: I’ve gotten a lot of useful information from commenters and elsewhere that throws some light on the cartoon, so I’ll collate it here. First, thanks to Marc Francisco of www.phonebooth.org, who sent me this photo from a Bell System press release:
![]()
According to him, the copy read, “A pretty World’s Fair visitor makes a call from a Serpentine booth, so called because of its unique serpent-like design. All booths on the Fairgrounds are equipped with the Bell System’s newly developed Touch-Tone service which speeds calling by push buttons instead of a dial.”
(Touch-Tone! Another intimation of the future!) Note that the “pretty visitor” is wearing pumps, like the woman in the cartoon. No kid in a pushcart, though. Perhaps “she’s calling the operator”:http://www.phonebooth.org/phoneadverts/full_of_bees.html to find out where he went.
Then Bill Cotter sent a link to a shot of the booths “in use”:http://www.worldsfairphotos.com/nywf64/phones.htm at the time of the Fair, as well as a photo “explaining”:http://www.worldsfairphotos.com/nywf64/hertz.htm the kid’s “pushcart”. Thanks also to Mike for sending another link to photos of the booths at the time of The Fair, and several shots of them in their current state of “tragic disrepair”:http://64nywf65.20m.com/Booth/Booth.htm. He’s got more to say in his comment below …
Finally, for those of you astonished to learn that outdoor phone booths weren’t installed in Manhattan until about 1960—where did Superman change clothes when he was outside?—this ad from 1955 suggests they came late (?!) to Manhattan.]
In the same issue, too, I accidentally ran across an ad for perfume that was so modern, it jumped off the page (click for larger size):
![]()
Compare it to these two ads, one for perfume, and the other for makeup, taken from the same issue, that exemplify the competition (click for larger size):
![]()
![]()
By comparison, the ad for the Fabergé perfume stands out, doesn’t it? Unlike the other two, it’s selling a feeling, an impression of carnality, rather than features (“the modern way to carry spray,” “glides on easily”). It’s like an ad for, well, the future.
Often, though, the future has been around for longer than we think. Lycra® (generic name: “Spandex”:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spandex) is a case in point. I always thought that it was a relatively recent invention. Turns out I’m wrong: it was invented in 1959. Didn’t take long to get it to market, either, evidently. Check out this ad featuring it from the February 3, 1962 issue of TNY:
![]()
Still, I’ll bet you not one Beatles fan who saw this ad suspected that “hair bands” were already a foregone conclusion…
The Wavy Rule, a Daily Comic by Paul Morris: A Pen Is Just a Pen
![]()
In today’s cinematic “Wavy Rule,” Paul imagines a moment at Rick’s Café Américain that somehow ended up on the cutting-room floor, but will strike a chord with anyone who’s ever signed for a bill, had a midnight inspiration, or fished through the workplace pen caddy for an empty promise. Notwithstanding both beautiful friendships and beautiful penmanship, ink, like love, can be poignantly impermanent. Click to enlarge!
More by Paul Morris: Our very own upside-down question-mark naming contest! Plus, “The Wavy Rule” archive; a very funny webcomic, “Arnjuice“; a motley Flickr page; various beautifully off-kilter cartoon collections for sale and free download at Lulu.
Let’s Track Presidential Campaign Spam
I’ve been seeing a lot more Obama-related spam (I think I remember one like “Michelle Obama takes lover”) than McCain-related spam. Why? Are spammers Republicans? Are the Obamas just sexier to think about than the McCains?
Either way, as we know from modern media strategy, every little meme counts, so I’m going to keep track (in a casual, unscientific way) of what election-related spam I get from here to November, and try to suss out what it says about the collective unconscious of the electorate (or the spamectorate). Please copy and paste the spam you get into the comments, or email me the subject lines/relevant content–not the emails themselves, or they might just never get to me. If you’re reading this and you’re a spammer yourself, I hope you’ll consider balancing out the content, and please do spell-check.
Here are my first two, which appeared right after each other in my work spam box:
McCain withdraws support for offshore drilling
Obama bribes countrymen to win votes
